User:Morgan L. Paull/Notebook/C.Dog V1.0 - T7 Promoter/2011/07/13: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
==Checking Sequences from second round of ligations==
==Checking Sequences from second round of ligations==
* G11, G12, both good, but R17, R18, R22, R23 and R24 are all in GFP backbones, rather than RFP.
* G11, G12, both good, but R16, R17, R18, R22, R23 and R24 are all in GFP backbones, rather than RFP.
--> G11L2 and G12L2 both good to go (either .1 or .2 is fine on both). R17, R18, R22, R23 and R24 still problematic.
--> G11L2 and G12L2 both good to go (either .1 or .2 is fine on both). R16, R17, R18, R22, R23 and R24 still problematic.





Revision as of 15:11, 13 July 2011

C.Dog T7 Promoter Project <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Checking Sequences from second round of ligations

  • G11, G12, both good, but R16, R17, R18, R22, R23 and R24 are all in GFP backbones, rather than RFP.

--> G11L2 and G12L2 both good to go (either .1 or .2 is fine on both). R16, R17, R18, R22, R23 and R24 still problematic.