User:Moira M. Esson/Notebook/CHEM-581/2013/03/01: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
'''Figure 1. Fluorescence of hydrogel samples modified with Lamponite clay using an unmodified pipette for pressure testing''' | '''Figure 1. Fluorescence of hydrogel samples modified with Lamponite clay using an unmodified pipette for pressure testing''' | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[Image:Fluorescence of Rhodamine 6G collected from pressure test of hydrogels with Lamponite clay and using an unmodified pipette.png]] | |||
'''Figure 2. Fluorescence of hydrogel samples modified with NaMT clay using an unmodified pipette for pressure testing''' | '''Figure 2. Fluorescence of hydrogel samples modified with NaMT clay using an unmodified pipette for pressure testing''' | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 63: | Line 64: | ||
Notes: | Notes: | ||
*The amount of dye, or concentration of dye, that was diffused from the hydrogels using an unmodified pipette was significantly lower than that of a bent pipette. | *The amount of dye, or concentration of dye, that was diffused from the hydrogels using an unmodified pipette was significantly lower than that of a bent pipette. | ||
*The general trends observed using a bent pipette were also observed with an unmodified pipette. | *The general trends observed using a bent pipette were also observed with an unmodified pipette.(Unmodified clay had the highest absorbance values. On average, hydrogels with NaMT clays had a higher absorbance than the hydrogels prepared with lamponite clays. Similarly, the higher molecular weight PVA hydrogels exhibited higher absorbance values, indicating these hydrogels are better at exerting/responding to sheer pressure). | ||
*Similar to the bent pipette, the concentration of Rhodamine 6G in the samples is extremely low in comparison to the 0.25μM Rhodamine 6G control, with the highest absorbance value of 9.204 observed in the 50:50 ratio of PVA MW 130,000:NaMT in comparison to the highest absorbance value of 606.17999 in the Rhodamine 6G 0.25μM. Another procedure that will exert more sheer pressure will be determined. A new method for the preparation of hydrogels will be considered where a single layer of clay will be incorporated into the hydrogel rather than having clay distributed throughout the hydrogel. | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 21:59, 7 March 2013
Project name | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Objectives
Pressure tests using an unmodified pipette
Figure 1. Fluorescence of hydrogel samples modified with Lamponite clay using an unmodified pipette for pressure testing Figure 2. Fluorescence of hydrogel samples modified with NaMT clay using an unmodified pipette for pressure testing Figure 3. Fluorescence of all hydrogel samples using and unmodified pipette for pressure testing
Microspheres
|