User:Michael S. Bible/Notebook/571/2014/10/01: Difference between revisions
(→Notes) |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Procedure taken from [[User:Douglas_M._Fox/Notebook/AU_CHEM-571_F2011_Lab_Support/2014/10/01|Dr. Fox]] | Procedure taken from [[User:Douglas_M._Fox/Notebook/AU_CHEM-571_F2011_Lab_Support/2014/10/01|Dr. Fox]] | ||
==Data== | ==Data== |
Revision as of 12:32, 19 October 2014
Biomaterials Design Lab | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Analysis of Dialysis Begun YesterdayPost-dialysis solutions from all of the wells in the dialysis chamber were analyzed using UV-Vis using the following protocol:
Procedure taken from Dr. Fox
DataFigure 1 shows the corrected UV-Vis Bradford Spectra for all Post-Dialysis Solutions. Figure 2 shows the corrected UV-Vis Bradford Spectra for the post-dialysis solutions from the non-protein side of the dialysis chamber. From the negative absorbance values, it is clear that there is no protein present. This is expected since the dialysis tubing used had a molecular weight cut-off of 3500 g/mol. Figure 3 shows the corrected UV-Vis Bradford Spectra for the post-dialysis solutions from the protein side of the dialysis chamber. It is clear from the spectra that there is still a lot of protein in each of the chambers, and the post-dialysis concentration of Lysozyme in solution almost perfectly matches the concentration of Lysozyme in the stock solution. Figure 4 shows the calculations done to determine the concentration of Lysozyme in each solution. From these calculations, it would seem that the actual concentration of stock Lysozyme solution is .005 g/L rather than .125 g/L as believed.
|