User:Michael F. Nagle/Notebook/Chem 571/2012/09/25: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
*Obtain two sets of UV/Vis spectra for Au/BSA solutions with varying concentrations of Tris, to see how absorbance changes over time
*Obtain two sets of UV/Vis spectra for Au/BSA solutions with varying concentrations of Tris, to see how absorbance changes over time
==Procedure==
==Procedure==
#Protein extraction
*Protein extraction
##Cells were removed from freezer and warmed to room temperature in a water bath.
**[[User:Mary_Mendoza|Mary Mendoza]] and [[User:Puja_Moody|Puja Moody]] extracted the protein prepared [[User:Mary_Mendoza/Notebook/CHEM_571_Experimental_Biological_Chemistry_I/2012/09/19|9/19]]
##Cells were sonicated to break membranes and allow ADA and the other contents of the cell into the broth
*Solutions of 70 [Au/BSA] prepared [[User:Michael_F._Nagle/Notebook/Chem_571/2012/09/19|9/19]] with Tris at molarities of .05mM, .5mM, 5mM, 50mM, 100mM, 200mM, 500mM, and 1M went through two rounds each of UV/Vis.
###Each vial was placed in an ice bath for 30 seconds
###Sonication device was placed in each vial for 30 seconds
###This was repeated 3 times for each vial.
##Cells were centrifuged at 18000rpm and 4°C for 2 hours to seperate ADA from E. Coli
## Binding and elution buffers were purified via vacuum filtration and a 450nm membrane filter.
###A buchner funnel was attached to a flask, along with a vacuum pump.
###A 450nm membrane was put in the buchner funnel
###The binding buffer was filtered first, so that imidazole left behind by the elution buffer would not contaminate it.
## Vacuum filtration was used to seperate proteins from cells. ADA was collected in falcon vials and refridgerated.
#Solutions of Au/BSA at a mole ratio of 70 (at which fibers are not produced) with Tris at molarities of .05mM, .5mM, 5mM, 50mM, 100mM, 200mM, 500mM, and 1M went through two rounds each of UV/Vis.
##Stock solution for Tris was made
###1mol/L *.025L = .025mol Tris needed
###.025mol * 121.14g/mol = 3.0285g Tris weighed
## The equation M1V1=M2V2 was used to calculate the amount of stock and water needed in the 100mM, 200mM, 500mM and 1M tubes. A serial dilution was done from 500mM to .05mM to fill the rest of the tubes. 1mL from each tube was moved to the next with a pipette.


==Data==
==Data==
{| border="1"
|+ Amount of Tris stock and water in each tube
! scope="col" |'''Tris Buffer concentration'''
! scope="col" |'''amount of water (mL)'''
! scope="col" |'''amount of tris (mL)'''
|-
| .05 mM||0.9938||0.0625
|-
| .5 mM||0.9875||0.0125
|-
| 5 mM||0.975||0.025
|-
| 50 mM||0.95||0.05
|-
| 100 mM||0.9||0.1
|-
| 200 mM||0.8||0.2
|-
| 500 mM||0.5||0.5
|-
| 1 M||0||1
|}
==Data and Conclusions==
[[Image:Tris2trialsvariousmolar.JPG]]
[[Image:Tris2trialsvariousmolar.JPG]]
*No significant difference is seen between UV/Vis trials, except for 5mM in the second trial, which has a much higher absorbency peak. More trials should be run to see if this is random error.
<br>Results of other group:<br>
 
[[Image:Team2graph.jpg]]
==Discussion==
*Opposite trends can be seen between the two groups' trials. In ours, lower molarities of Tris resulted in higher absorbance, while the Chem-571 class last year, lower absorbance for lower molarities of Tris could be seen. Their absorbance values were also much higher. The fact that opposite trends are seen in all samples means that if this was due to error, it was a systematic error. More trials should be run.
*No significant difference is seen between our two UV/Vis trials, except for 5mM in the second trial, which has a much higher absorbency peak. This may be due to random error.
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
|}
|}


__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

Revision as of 21:50, 6 December 2012

Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Objectives

  • Extract ADA from E. Coli
  • Obtain two sets of UV/Vis spectra for Au/BSA solutions with varying concentrations of Tris, to see how absorbance changes over time

Procedure

  • Protein extraction
  • Solutions of 70 [Au/BSA] prepared 9/19 with Tris at molarities of .05mM, .5mM, 5mM, 50mM, 100mM, 200mM, 500mM, and 1M went through two rounds each of UV/Vis.

Data


Results of other group:

Discussion

  • Opposite trends can be seen between the two groups' trials. In ours, lower molarities of Tris resulted in higher absorbance, while the Chem-571 class last year, lower absorbance for lower molarities of Tris could be seen. Their absorbance values were also much higher. The fact that opposite trends are seen in all samples means that if this was due to error, it was a systematic error. More trials should be run.
  • No significant difference is seen between our two UV/Vis trials, except for 5mM in the second trial, which has a much higher absorbency peak. This may be due to random error.


Retrieved from "https://openwetware.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=User:Michael_F._Nagle/Notebook/Chem_571/2012/09/25&oldid=662727"