User:Mary Mendoza/Notebook/CHEM572 Exp. Biological Chemistry II/2013/02/06
From OpenWetWare
(Difference between revisions)
(→Computational Screening) |
(→Computational Screening) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | <!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | ||
| - | == | + | ==Screening== |
* Maestro imported structures | * Maestro imported structures | ||
* Structures were sorted by docking score | * Structures were sorted by docking score | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* Some molecules are efficient in terms of geometry and size but few hydrogen bonds. | * Some molecules are efficient in terms of geometry and size but few hydrogen bonds. | ||
| + | * Under the property options > show all | ||
| + | * Select the fpscreen_01-1, sorted by the Tanimoto coefficient. | ||
| + | * Compared the docking score and the Tanimoto coefficient. Most scores were low as expected. Molecules that had docking scores averaging between 7-8 were considered alongside its Tanimoto coefficient. | ||
| + | * Some molecules have high docking scores but do not have affinity to the binding pocket. Thus, docking scores are unreliable for this circumstance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * After selecting the molecules, the structures were viewed under 2D Sketcher. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * The zinc ID number for each structure were entered to the zinc website to verify its availability for purchase. | ||
| + | * The table of structures were exported to excel to view the vendor list. | ||
| + | * Eight structures were chosen based on their docking score and five for their similarity to aspirin. | ||
| + | * The final list of structures were uploaded into dropbox. | ||
Revision as of 16:09, 6 February 2013
Main project page Previous entry Next entry
| |
Screening
| |



