User:Mary Mendoza/Notebook/CHEM572 Exp. Biological Chemistry II/2013/02/06

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Computational Screening)
(Computational Screening)
(3 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 6: Line 6:
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
-
==Computational Screening==
+
==Screening==
* Maestro imported structures
* Maestro imported structures
* Structures were sorted by docking score
* Structures were sorted by docking score
Line 17: Line 17:
* Some molecules are efficient in terms of geometry and size but few hydrogen bonds.
* Some molecules are efficient in terms of geometry and size but few hydrogen bonds.
 +
* Under the property options > show all
 +
* Select the fpscreen_01-1, sorted by the Tanimoto coefficient.
 +
* Compared the docking score and the Tanimoto coefficient. Most scores were low as expected. Molecules that had docking scores averaging between 7-8 were considered alongside its Tanimoto coefficient.
 +
* Some molecules have high docking scores but do not have affinity to the binding pocket. Thus, docking scores are unreliable for this circumstance.
 +
 +
* After selecting the molecules, the structures were viewed under 2D Sketcher.
 +
 +
 +
* The zinc ID number for each structure were entered to the zinc website to verify its availability for purchase.
 +
* The table of structures were exported to excel to view the vendor list.
 +
* Eight structures were chosen based on their docking score and five for their similarity to aspirin.
 +
* The final list of structures were uploaded into dropbox.

Revision as of 15:09, 6 February 2013

Project name Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Screening

  • Maestro imported structures
  • Structures were sorted by docking score
  • Choose molecules with two criteria similarity with aspirin and basis of docking score.
  • The structures will be chosen with respect to the Tanimoto coefficient.


  • On the workspace, observed the structures with its bonding to the amino acids located on the binding pocket.
  • Molecules with Arginine bind best to the carboxylate of the amino acids.
  • Some molecules are efficient in terms of geometry and size but few hydrogen bonds.
  • Under the property options > show all
  • Select the fpscreen_01-1, sorted by the Tanimoto coefficient.
  • Compared the docking score and the Tanimoto coefficient. Most scores were low as expected. Molecules that had docking scores averaging between 7-8 were considered alongside its Tanimoto coefficient.
  • Some molecules have high docking scores but do not have affinity to the binding pocket. Thus, docking scores are unreliable for this circumstance.
  • After selecting the molecules, the structures were viewed under 2D Sketcher.


  • The zinc ID number for each structure were entered to the zinc website to verify its availability for purchase.
  • The table of structures were exported to excel to view the vendor list.
  • Eight structures were chosen based on their docking score and five for their similarity to aspirin.
  • The final list of structures were uploaded into dropbox.



Personal tools