User:Jarle Pahr/Metascience

From OpenWetWare

< User:Jarle Pahr(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Notes on the science of science: '''Publication bias:''' Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: http://www.bmj.com/content/331/7514/433)
Current revision (13:24, 22 June 2013) (view source)
 
(7 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
 
+
Notes on the science and methods of science, including issues of verification and reproducibility.
-
Notes on the science of science:
+
'''Publication bias:'''
'''Publication bias:'''
Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: http://www.bmj.com/content/331/7514/433
Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: http://www.bmj.com/content/331/7514/433
 +
 +
 +
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test: http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7109/629
 +
 +
 +
http://emlab.rose2.brandeis.edu/rejections
 +
 +
 +
http://tidsskriftet.no/article/3006690
 +
 +
 +
https://bora.hib.no/bitstream/10049/338/1/Rekdal2012EnVandring2.pdf
 +
 +
 +
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=6577844
 +
 +
Reproducibility: Six red flags for suspect work: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v497/n7450/full/497433a.html
 +
 +
http://smallpondscience.com/2013/06/04/pretending-you-planned-to-test-that-hypothesis-the-whole-time/
 +
 +
Publication metrics:
 +
 +
 +
 +
Google - journal h-index: http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues
 +
 +
 +
Citation practices:
 +
 +
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043

Current revision

Notes on the science and methods of science, including issues of verification and reproducibility.

Publication bias:

Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: http://www.bmj.com/content/331/7514/433


Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test: http://www.bmj.com/content/315/7109/629


http://emlab.rose2.brandeis.edu/rejections


http://tidsskriftet.no/article/3006690


https://bora.hib.no/bitstream/10049/338/1/Rekdal2012EnVandring2.pdf


Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=6577844

Reproducibility: Six red flags for suspect work: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v497/n7450/full/497433a.html

http://smallpondscience.com/2013/06/04/pretending-you-planned-to-test-that-hypothesis-the-whole-time/

Publication metrics:


Google - journal h-index: http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues


Citation practices:

http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043

Personal tools