User:Tkadm30/Notebook/NK603: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
< User:Tkadm30 | Notebook
(New page: == Bioremediation or eugenic science ? == * I often see this word at a numerous places but rarely a sound explanation to the inherent motivation of adopting bioremediation for synthetic b...) |
|||
| (14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Bioremediation or eugenic science ? == | == NK603: Bioremediation or eugenic science ? == | ||
* I often see this word at a numerous places but rarely a sound explanation to the inherent motivation of adopting bioremediation for synthetic biology, a subset of genetic engineering using live organisms as the media for creating new and artificial life forms. | * I often see this word at a numerous places but rarely a sound explanation to the inherent motivation of adopting bioremediation for synthetic biology, a subset of genetic engineering using live organisms as the media for creating new and artificial life forms. | ||
* Back in World-War 2, were the germans developing the eugenic science or were they "experimenting" new bioremediation techniques with organophosphate gases? Is thus bioremediation a singular aspect of eugenics, especially for devices developed for the E.coli K-12 strain, a prokariote organism ? | * Back in World-War 2, were the germans developing the eugenic science or were they "experimenting" new bioremediation techniques with organophosphate gases? | ||
** Is thus bioremediation a singular aspect of eugenics, especially for devices developed for the E.coli K-12 strain, a prokariote organism ? | |||
* What are the real objectives of Synthetic biology beyond inducing cancerous cells prematurely to mouses fed with genetically-modified corn ? | * What are the real objectives of Synthetic biology beyond inducing cancerous cells prematurely to mouses fed with genetically-modified corn ? | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
** Were the scientists who developed the strain of GE corn (NK603) knowledgable or were the mutations caused from mistakes in the protocol ? | ** Were the scientists who developed the strain of GE corn (NK603) knowledgable or were the mutations caused from mistakes in the protocol ? | ||
''Feel free to add your comments here | ''Feel free to add your comments here or using the talk page!'' | ||
=== Common food products suspected to contains GE corn. === | |||
* canola oil (chips) | |||
* corn syrup (marshmallows) | |||
* corn itself (?) | |||
* hydrogenated vegetable oil (?) | |||
=== References === | === References === | ||
| Line 25: | Line 33: | ||
"We make our world significant by the courage of our questions, and by the depth of our answers." ~Carl Sagan | "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions, and by the depth of our answers." ~Carl Sagan | ||
"Pour faciliter économiquement la sélection du maïs, Monsanto a utilisé et maintenu au sein des plants GM gène marqueur de résistance à un antibiotique appelé NPTII (néomycine phosphotransferase II). Ce dernier produit dans la cellule végétale une protéine qui induit une résistance à la Kanamycine, antibiotique bien connu." [http://www.criigen.org/SiteFr//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=106&Itemid=79 1] | |||
=== See also === | |||
* Proposition 37: http://www.carighttoknow.org/ | |||
* A movie on the situation of organic agriculture in Hawaii as reported by organic Hawaii farmers: http://www.truththeory.org/genetic-engineering-chemical-warfare/ | |||
Revision as of 18:03, 19 February 2013
NK603: Bioremediation or eugenic science ?
- I often see this word at a numerous places but rarely a sound explanation to the inherent motivation of adopting bioremediation for synthetic biology, a subset of genetic engineering using live organisms as the media for creating new and artificial life forms.
- Back in World-War 2, were the germans developing the eugenic science or were they "experimenting" new bioremediation techniques with organophosphate gases?
- Is thus bioremediation a singular aspect of eugenics, especially for devices developed for the E.coli K-12 strain, a prokariote organism ?
- What are the real objectives of Synthetic biology beyond inducing cancerous cells prematurely to mouses fed with genetically-modified corn ?
- Is cancer detection over cancer prevention the culprit and main concern of Synthia design ?
- Is not human based experimentation strictly forbidden by some public authority ?
- If so, is not bioremediation a futile term to hiden eugenics into a philantropist hat?
- Or is the people not the only authority which should encompass and lead scientific research from the hands of the governments and corporations?
- Would the germans have approved bioremediation, assuming they knew Hitler was preparing a large-scale genocide ?
- Why did the mouses developed severe mutations over a long-term period as they were fed corn grown for mass-consumption ?
- Were the scientists who developed the strain of GE corn (NK603) knowledgable or were the mutations caused from mistakes in the protocol ?
Feel free to add your comments here or using the talk page!
Common food products suspected to contains GE corn.
- canola oil (chips)
- corn syrup (marshmallows)
- corn itself (?)
- hydrogenated vegetable oil (?)
References
"We make our world significant by the courage of our questions, and by the depth of our answers." ~Carl Sagan
"Pour faciliter économiquement la sélection du maïs, Monsanto a utilisé et maintenu au sein des plants GM gène marqueur de résistance à un antibiotique appelé NPTII (néomycine phosphotransferase II). Ce dernier produit dans la cellule végétale une protéine qui induit une résistance à la Kanamycine, antibiotique bien connu." 1
See also
- Proposition 37: http://www.carighttoknow.org/
- A movie on the situation of organic agriculture in Hawaii as reported by organic Hawaii farmers: http://www.truththeory.org/genetic-engineering-chemical-warfare/
