User:Daniel Mietchen/Notebook/Open Science/2010/10/28: Difference between revisions
m (→Practical test) |
m (→Practical test) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Practical test == | == Practical test == | ||
During [http://www.openaccessweek.org/ Open Access Week 2010], the criteria shall be put to a first practical test by being applied to an alphabetic range of publishing platforms, listed below. The scoring method is still evolving. Everyone is welcome to add some more journals. Numbers in parentheses represent an estimate for the relative weight of these criteria (they add up to 100% over all criteria). <!--Numbers in brackets represent an estimate for the relative weight of individual points (they add up to 100% per criterion).--> Since editing wikitables is not very convenient, I turned this one into a [https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AiQvcnWHnwgmdFFKNzlIc2k1SFRnLUhFQmRQa09Eanc&hl=en&authkey=CIr7qLQH collaboratively editable spreadsheet], embedded into the original scaffold below. | During [http://www.openaccessweek.org/ Open Access Week 2010], the criteria shall be put to a first practical test by being applied to an alphabetic range of publishing platforms, listed below. The scoring method is still evolving. Everyone is welcome to add some more journals. Numbers in parentheses represent an estimate for the relative weight of these criteria (they add up to 100% over all criteria). <!--Numbers in brackets represent an estimate for the relative weight of individual points (they add up to 100% per criterion).--> Since editing wikitables is not very convenient, I turned this one into a [https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AiQvcnWHnwgmdFFKNzlIc2k1SFRnLUhFQmRQa09Eanc&hl=en&authkey=CIr7qLQH collaboratively editable spreadsheet], embedded into the original scaffold below. See also [http://www.science3point0.com/evomri/2010/10/28/journal-of-the-future-putting-the-criteria-to-a-practical-test/ blog commentary]. | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" |
Revision as of 06:20, 28 October 2010
What would science look like if it were open? | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of the futureThis page is a copy of Wikiversity:Journal of the future. For background, see this original post (in German) and this commentary (in English). For discussion, see Talk page or here. Core criteriaNeed some more profiling to reduce overlap, and brushing to improve flow.
Practical testDuring Open Access Week 2010, the criteria shall be put to a first practical test by being applied to an alphabetic range of publishing platforms, listed below. The scoring method is still evolving. Everyone is welcome to add some more journals. Numbers in parentheses represent an estimate for the relative weight of these criteria (they add up to 100% over all criteria). Since editing wikitables is not very convenient, I turned this one into a collaboratively editable spreadsheet, embedded into the original scaffold below. See also blog commentary.
|