User:Brian P. Josey/Notebook/2010/06/22: Difference between revisions
(Autocreate 2010/06/22 Entry for User:Brian_P._Josey/Notebook) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| colspan="2"| | | colspan="2"| | ||
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | <!-- ##### DO NOT edit above this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### --> | ||
== | ==Yesterday and Today== | ||
* | Today is going to be a busy day, I am fitting in what I was going to do yesterday with what I was planning on doing today. To that effect, I am running a PCR for Ant, creating a new emulsion, and filming and running a couple of magnetic experiments. | ||
==Emulsion and Magnetic Experiment== | |||
I needed to create a new emulsion because the other one would not go into the emulsion state like I wanted. I am following an old procedure that I stumbled upon [[User:Brian P. Josey/Notebook/2010/06/08|a couple of days ago]]. To a small micro-centrifuge tube I added in order: | |||
* 1 μL Ferritin stock solution | |||
* 0.1 μL Tween 20 | |||
* 98.9 μL mineral oil | |||
I then sonicated the mixture until it became milky, and flowed in about 10 μL of the emulsion into a flow cell I created earlier. I noticed that today, it created an emulsion much more quickly than my attempt yesterday, taking only about 30 sec to reach the point I wanted. It appears that over time the emulsion mixture might break down and I'll have to replace it every week or so. | |||
I put the flow cell on to the microscope. One thing that I noticed right away was that the droplets of ferritin were in a high concentration, and when I reach the point that I am measuring their velocity and plotting it as a function of their diameter and number of ferritin, I will have to have a lower concentration. This will prevent bumping, scrapping and any other interaction that would interfere with my data. For my experiment, I have the magnet held by a three pronged clamp so that it does not move and remains at a constant distance. I placed it so that the tip of the magnet was placed up against the glass as close as possible without interfering with the optics. This is what it looks like: | |||
<center> | |||
[[Image:Magnetic Mount.JPG|450px]] | |||
</center> | |||
I then ran two different experiments. One with the magnet being held on the upper right corner of the field of view, and then on the lower left corner. I ran each of these for 15 min, and took a picture of the screen every second. Here is the video for the magnet at the upper right hand corner: | |||
<center> | |||
<html> | |||
</html> | |||
</center> | |||
And the lower left hand corner: | |||
<center> | |||
<html> | |||
</html> | |||
</center> | |||
In both cases, the frames are sped up so that while they were captured at 1 frame per second, they are presented as 10 frames per second. However, do to a precession issue in the software that I don't know how to resolve yet, it comes out to two minutes and not 90 seconds. This is the software that I use to assemble the video and not the capturing software. Note that these are not of the same field of view, but of two very closely spaced field of views. I had wanted to film the same spot, but the stage was bumped while I was reorienting the magnet, and I had to use two different field of views. | |||
==PCR== | |||
The same time that I was setting up and running the ferritin experiment, I was also setting up and running a PCR for Ant. The one that he asked for was similar to one he ran [[User:Anthony Salvagno/Notebook/Research/2009/07/14/PCR to make dsDNA for stretching| in November]]. He wanted 5 tubes containing the pRL574-F853-dig 10 μM dNTP, and five more tubes containing the pRL574-F834-dig 10 μM dNTP. All ten tubes contained the pRL574-R5263-bio 10 μM dNTP. Because we have new stock solutions of the chemicals, I had to recalculate the volumes added to achieve the desired concentrations. The final mixture of reagents came out to: | |||
<center> | |||
</center> | |||
Revision as of 09:22, 22 June 2010
 Project name
|
<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> |
Yesterday and TodayToday is going to be a busy day, I am fitting in what I was going to do yesterday with what I was planning on doing today. To that effect, I am running a PCR for Ant, creating a new emulsion, and filming and running a couple of magnetic experiments. Emulsion and Magnetic ExperimentI needed to create a new emulsion because the other one would not go into the emulsion state like I wanted. I am following an old procedure that I stumbled upon a couple of days ago. To a small micro-centrifuge tube I added in order:
I then sonicated the mixture until it became milky, and flowed in about 10 μL of the emulsion into a flow cell I created earlier. I noticed that today, it created an emulsion much more quickly than my attempt yesterday, taking only about 30 sec to reach the point I wanted. It appears that over time the emulsion mixture might break down and I'll have to replace it every week or so. I put the flow cell on to the microscope. One thing that I noticed right away was that the droplets of ferritin were in a high concentration, and when I reach the point that I am measuring their velocity and plotting it as a function of their diameter and number of ferritin, I will have to have a lower concentration. This will prevent bumping, scrapping and any other interaction that would interfere with my data. For my experiment, I have the magnet held by a three pronged clamp so that it does not move and remains at a constant distance. I placed it so that the tip of the magnet was placed up against the glass as close as possible without interfering with the optics. This is what it looks like:
I then ran two different experiments. One with the magnet being held on the upper right corner of the field of view, and then on the lower left corner. I ran each of these for 15 min, and took a picture of the screen every second. Here is the video for the magnet at the upper right hand corner: <html> </html> And the lower left hand corner: <html> </html> In both cases, the frames are sped up so that while they were captured at 1 frame per second, they are presented as 10 frames per second. However, do to a precession issue in the software that I don't know how to resolve yet, it comes out to two minutes and not 90 seconds. This is the software that I use to assemble the video and not the capturing software. Note that these are not of the same field of view, but of two very closely spaced field of views. I had wanted to film the same spot, but the stage was bumped while I was reorienting the magnet, and I had to use two different field of views. PCRThe same time that I was setting up and running the ferritin experiment, I was also setting up and running a PCR for Ant. The one that he asked for was similar to one he ran in November. He wanted 5 tubes containing the pRL574-F853-dig 10 μM dNTP, and five more tubes containing the pRL574-F834-dig 10 μM dNTP. All ten tubes contained the pRL574-R5263-bio 10 μM dNTP. Because we have new stock solutions of the chemicals, I had to recalculate the volumes added to achieve the desired concentrations. The final mixture of reagents came out to:
| |
