User:Andy Maloney/Notebook/Lab Notebook of Andy Maloney/2009/08/31/Ethics course Lecture 1

Lecture 1

• I'm not sure but I think this professor thinks that a professional is a person of knowledge and that a person of the public asks questions to them because a professional has knowledge. This then requires a professional to have a "paternal" mentality such that it is then required by the professional to give the public the answer.
  • If this is true then the professional (or physician which I think he really is talking about) has power over the public and the professional will want to keep that knowledge from the public such that the professional stays a professional. This I find unethical.
• There seems to be some sort of connection between scientists and physicians that the prof is making that I just don't understand.
• He notes that many people from many different backgrounds came together in America to urban centers. People then started to use technology sometimes to ill effects.
  • This is the first ethical dilemma for technology. This is a good spot to find how people started to react to technology.
• I think I may need to learn Latin because this guy uses a lot of it for some reason. He also uses a large amount of vocabulary. I'm going to catalog all of the vocab he uses in hopes that I will learn some of it. I should note that I didn't start doing this until half way through the lecture.
  • medicaments
  • Some Latin that sounds like "in whola gea". No clue.
  • impetus
  • incriminate
  • aberrans
  • rife
  • Man I need a vocabulary lesson.
  • Aequinimitable? No clue. But phonetically it sounded like this.
  • interdigitated I have no clue how he used this one in a sentence.
  • inextricably
  • perdurable
  • retted
  • "as initiatia" Again, Latin. No clue...
  • ontological
  • conflation
  • expent - No clue what this is but it sounded like what I wrote.
  • purloining
  • perdurable
  • modernity
  • gravitas
  • concretize
  • onus
  • technofolism - It sounded like this. What this means, no clue.
• Hahahahahaha! He calls "libertarian" views (note that he emphasized in a negative way, the word libertarian (at least that's the way it seemed)) something like open science. He says that there is a new movement where "professionals" are giving knowledge to regular people without the regular people asking for it. I'm pretty sure he means things like OWW and Wikipedia.
• He notes that ethics and morality are not the same thing.
  • I actually agree with this.
• I need to tape these lectures.
• He's making a claim that technology drives politics which then drives social interactions and the ethics for a society. I haven't heard any proof of this though.
• What is a longitudinal doses?
  • Again, since the professor confused me with this terminology, I cannot explain the context of this term but here is the closest thing I can find of it.

I'm not sure what I took away from this lecture other than there wasn't very much talk about ethics. I should note that there may have been but, I was thoroughly confused by the vocabulary and I unfortunately focused on the words I didn't understand. I do remember him talking a rather large amount about Nazis though.