User:Allison K. Alix/Notebook/Thesis Research/2013/06/28: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 131: Line 131:




[[Image:MB DNA calibration OWW imageeee.png]]





Revision as of 09:32, 1 July 2013

Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

FCS Measurements

  • Run the following samples of MB/DNA

1) 10nM MB + 8nM DNA

2) 5nM MB 4nM DNA

3) 1nM MB 960pM DNA

4) 500pM MB 400pM DNA

5) 100pM MB 80pM DNA

6) 50pM MB 40pM MB

7) 25pM MB 20pM DNA

  • Run the following oligio-D samples

1) 20pM

2) 40pM

3) 60pM

4) 80pM

5) 100pM

Calculations

MOLECULAR BEACON:

  • 7.61μM (x) = 20nM (1000uL)

x = 2.62uL 7.61uM MB in 997.38uL PBS

  • 20nM (x) = (30uL)(10nM)

15uL in 15uL PBS

  • 20nM (x) = 2nM(100uL)

10uL in 90uL

  • 2nM (x) = 1nM (100uL)

x = 50uL in 50uL PBS

  • 200pM (100uL) = x (1nM)

x = 20uL in 80uL PBS

  • 100pM(100uL) = (200pM)(x)

x = 50uL in 50uL buffer

  • 50pM (30uL) = 100pM (x)

x = 15uL in 15uL

DNA:

  • 5.31uM (500uL) = x (53.1uM)

x = 50uL in 450uL PBS

  • 5.31uM (x) = 16nM (1000uL)

x = 3uL in 997uL PBS

  • 16nM (x) = (8nM) (100uL)

x = 50uL in 50uL PBS

  • 1.92nM (100uL) = x (8nM)

x = 24uL in 76 uL PBS

  • 0.8nM (100uL) = x (1.92nM)

x = 41.7uL in 58.3uL

  • 160pM (100) = x (800pM)

x = 20uL in 80uL

  • 80pM (100uL) = x (160pM)

x = 50uL in 50uL

  • 40pM (30uL) = x (80pm)

x = 15uL in 15uL PBS

OLIGIO-D

  • 10uM (x) = 1500uL (20000pM)

x = 3uL in 1497uL PBS

  • 20000pM (x) = 1000pM (100uL)

5 uL in 95 uL PBS

  • 1000pM (x) = 260uL (100pM)

26uL in 234uL PBS

  • 80pM = 80uL 100pM in 20uL PBS
  • 60pM = 60uL 100pM in 40uL PBS
  • 40pM = 40uL 100pM in 60uL PBS
  • 20pM = 20uL 100pM in 80uL PBS

FCS Data

The above image is a calibration curve of oligio D samples run for 300s with varying concentrations. We previously saw a trend in the 80pM, 60pM, and 40pM samples. This time, there was a linear trend in the 100pM, 80pM, and 60pM samples with the 40pM and 20pM samples dropping off. This might be an indication of a detection limit, however because we ran these same concentrations before, and the 40pM seemed to follow a linear trend with at least 2 others, we will be running these samples again. We plan to run some slightly higher than 100pM also.