Talk:Endy:Preparing Antibiotic Stocks: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Are stringent and relaxed the wrong way around...? | Are stringent and relaxed the wrong way around...? | ||
*'''[[User:Jason R. Kelly|Jason R. Kelly]] 07:08, 17 January 2008 (CST):''' I think it's right. Relaxed plasmids are normally higher copy, so you'd expect a higher concentration of antibiotic for them. | *'''[[User:Jason R. Kelly|Jason R. Kelly]] 07:08, 17 January 2008 (CST):''' I think it's right. Relaxed plasmids are normally higher copy, so you'd expect a higher concentration of antibiotic for them. | ||
*'''[[User:Hugh Kingston|hugh kingston]] 10:16, 4 February 2008 (CST)''': ok. i did not realise stringent and relaxed were types of plasmid, rather i thought the words referred to the strength of selection for the marker. | |||
Revision as of 09:16, 4 February 2008
Chloramphenicol
* Stock concentration - 34mg/ml in 100% Ethanol * Aliquots - 1ml * Working concentration = 25μ/ml (Stringent), 170μ/ml (relaxed)
Are stringent and relaxed the wrong way around...?
- Jason R. Kelly 07:08, 17 January 2008 (CST): I think it's right. Relaxed plasmids are normally higher copy, so you'd expect a higher concentration of antibiotic for them.
- hugh kingston 10:16, 4 February 2008 (CST): ok. i did not realise stringent and relaxed were types of plasmid, rather i thought the words referred to the strength of selection for the marker.
