Talk:Endy:Notebook/Synthetic Biology Open Language - Revision history

Deepsilence at 04:00, 10 May 2010

Deepsilence — Mon, 10 May 2010 04:00:11 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 10 May 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*'''[[User:Barry Canton\|BC]] 22:21, 21 July 2009 (EDT)''': I don't there is a need for a bidirectional RBS symbol, I've never seen one of those. I would make the empty lozenge into the forward RBS and keep the one with a minus for the reverse RBS. Alternatively, make the RBS an asymmetric shape so the directionality doesn't need to be an annotation - perhaps oval at the upstream end and squared off a the downstream end (e.g a reverse RBS would be an elongated D).		*'''[[User:Barry Canton\|BC]] 22:21, 21 July 2009 (EDT)''': I don't there is a need for a bidirectional RBS symbol, I've never seen one of those. I would make the empty lozenge into the forward RBS and keep the one with a minus for the reverse RBS. Alternatively, make the RBS an asymmetric shape so the directionality doesn't need to be an annotation - perhaps oval at the upstream end and squared off a the downstream end (e.g a reverse RBS would be an elongated D).
		+
		+	* Hi, I'm a little bit confused with the 5' overhang and 3' overhang notation. In a "conventional" notation, where the dsDNA is up 5'->3' and down 3'<-5', a 5' overhang would look like "\" instead of "/". But the notation looks opposite. Am I missing something?

Cesar A. Rodriguez: Talk:Endy:Notebook/BioBrick Open Language Specification moved to Talk:Endy:Notebook/Synthetic Biology Open Language

Cesar A. Rodriguez — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:28:39 GMT

Talk:Endy:Notebook/BioBrick Open Language Specification moved to Talk:Endy:Notebook/Synthetic Biology Open Language

←Older revision

Revision as of 05:28, 8 August 2009

Barry Canton: New page: *'''~~~~''': I don't there is a need for a bidirectional RBS symbol, I've never seen one of those. I would make the empty lozenge into the forward RBS and keep the one with a minus for th...

Barry Canton — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 02:21:34 GMT

New page: *'''~~~~''': I don't there is a need for a bidirectional RBS symbol, I've never seen one of those. I would make the empty lozenge into the forward RBS and keep the one with a minus for th...

New page

*'''[[User:Barry Canton|BC]] 22:21, 21 July 2009 (EDT)''': I don't there is a need for a bidirectional RBS symbol, I've never seen one of those. I would make the empty lozenge into the forward RBS and keep the one with a minus for the reverse RBS. Alternatively, make the RBS an asymmetric shape so the directionality doesn't need to be an annotation - perhaps oval at the upstream end and squared off a the downstream end (e.g a reverse RBS would be an elongated D).