Talk:CH391L/S13/DNA Computing

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 16:39, 1 April 2013 (EDT)''':How did he select against those which were not applicable? The combinatorial approach that gave all possible answers yields so many possibilities, I don't see how this is any improvement over traditional computer brute force approach if you can't eliminate the problem of selecting possible answers.
*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 16:39, 1 April 2013 (EDT)''':How did he select against those which were not applicable? The combinatorial approach that gave all possible answers yields so many possibilities, I don't see how this is any improvement over traditional computer brute force approach if you can't eliminate the problem of selecting possible answers.
*'''[[User:Jeffrey E. Barrick|Jeffrey E. Barrick]] 16:42, 1 April 2013 (EDT)''':DNA cryptography?
*'''[[User:Jeffrey E. Barrick|Jeffrey E. Barrick]] 16:42, 1 April 2013 (EDT)''':DNA cryptography?
 +
*'''[[User:Kevin Baldridge|Kevin Baldridge]] 16:45, 1 April 2013 (EDT)''':I think I might have shared this paper before, but it is very directly related to some of the topics you discuss here [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22722847 Single Cell Programmable Biocomputers]

Revision as of 15:45, 1 April 2013

  • Kevin Baldridge 16:39, 1 April 2013 (EDT):How did he select against those which were not applicable? The combinatorial approach that gave all possible answers yields so many possibilities, I don't see how this is any improvement over traditional computer brute force approach if you can't eliminate the problem of selecting possible answers.
  • Jeffrey E. Barrick 16:42, 1 April 2013 (EDT):DNA cryptography?
  • Kevin Baldridge 16:45, 1 April 2013 (EDT):I think I might have shared this paper before, but it is very directly related to some of the topics you discuss here Single Cell Programmable Biocomputers
Personal tools