Talk:BioNumber Of The Month: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: == neat analysis == This is a neat analysis. In general, I was wondering what you thought, in terms of pure energy, how much of cellular energy is needed in terms of ATP, versus how much...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== neat analysis == | == neat analysis == | ||
This is a neat analysis. In general, I was wondering what you thought, in terms of pure energy, how much of cellular energy is needed in terms of ATP, versus how much is directly converted from reduced NADH/NADPH compounds? I guess what's the ratio in terms of free energy. My gut feeling is that they are on the same order, and if they are, it might be a good complementary analysis. | This is a neat analysis. In general, I was wondering what you thought, in terms of pure energy, how much of cellular energy is needed in terms of ATP, versus how much is directly converted from reduced NADH/NADPH compounds? I guess what's the ratio in terms of free energy. My gut feeling is that they are on the same order, and if they are, it might be a good complementary analysis. :[[User:Skosuri|Skosuri]] 12:11, 18 February 2009 (EST) | ||
:[[User:Skosuri|Skosuri]] 12:11, 18 February 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 10:11, 18 February 2009
neat analysis
This is a neat analysis. In general, I was wondering what you thought, in terms of pure energy, how much of cellular energy is needed in terms of ATP, versus how much is directly converted from reduced NADH/NADPH compounds? I guess what's the ratio in terms of free energy. My gut feeling is that they are on the same order, and if they are, it might be a good complementary analysis. :Skosuri 12:11, 18 February 2009 (EST)
