Talk:20.109(S11):Wrap-up analysis and modelingb (Day8)

T/R

Please use the following order for all data: IPTG, IPTG/AHL, -/-, AHL.

Data should be written as: # units (% of AHL case). You can indicate the standard deviation of the data if it is known. (You may include one more significant figure than you believe (or not) for your classmates' reference, but don't go overboard!)

In notes you can explain if you are using week 1, week 4, or both data sets for the original system. Also specify which team's design you used, if your own did not produce colonies. Finally, definitely mention if some of your data points are untrustworthy due to saturation.

Group	Miller units and % maximal (original)	Miller units and % maximal (modified)	Notes
Sample	1320 (7.0%), 1470 (7.8%), 12,740 ± 20 (67%), 18,900 ± 300	700 (3.6%), 1280 (6.5%), 9100 ± 260 (46%), 19,600 ± 350	week 4 data only
Blue	1146.95 (3.4%), 1273.3 (3.8%), 31696.1 (95%), 33278.3	6111.7 (1176.6%), 6252.9 (1203.7%), 423.4 (81.5%), 519.5	week 4 data only

W/F

Please use the following order for all data: IPTG, IPTG/AHL, -/-, AHL.

Data should be written as: # units (% of AHL case). You can indicate the standard deviation of the data if it is known. (You may include one more significant figure than you believe (or not) for your classmates' reference, but don't go overboard!)

In notes you can explain if you are using week 1, week 4, or both data sets for the original system. Also specify which team's design you used, if your own did not produce colonies. Finally, definitely mention if some of your data points are untrustworthy due to saturation.

Group	Miller units and % maximal (original)	Miller units and % maximal (modified)	Notes
Sample	1320 (7.0%), 1470 (7.8%), 12,740 ± 20 (67%), 18,900 ± 300	700 (3.6%), 1280 (6.5%), 9100 ± 260 (46%), 19,600 ± 350	week 4 data only