SynBERC:Registry brainstorming: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (SynBERC:Registry cloning brainstorming moved to SynBERC:Registry brainstorming: mis typed) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Practical Outcomes== | ==Practical Outcomes== | ||
* | *List of 1st generation, simple CAD tools that people would use tomorrow if they were available. | ||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
*[[SynBERC:MIT/Calendar/2007-8-8|Registry for labs wishlist from MIT SB lunch]] | *[[SynBERC:MIT/Calendar/2007-8-8|Registry for labs wishlist from MIT SB lunch]] | ||
Revision as of 09:06, 13 September 2007
from Kevin:
"I was talking with Adam Arkin, who runs a DOE:GTL program and is pretty good at executing large-scale, center-based research projects like SynBERC. For the cloning and registry discussions, Adam suggested that we first agree on what decisions we are going to make before we start hashing out the issues. The idea is that it's better to settle up-front on what we want to emerge from the discussion before we get bogged down in technical complexities. Could the SLC/student sessions suggest some practical outcomes for each of these sessions as part of the brainstorming sessions?"
Practical Outcomes
- List of 1st generation, simple CAD tools that people would use tomorrow if they were available.
