Ssutton: PTL Logic

From OpenWetWare
Revision as of 13:15, 13 January 2006 by Ssutton (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Introduction

I am working to develop a new type of logic, called Post-Translational Logic, or PTL. PTL devices regulate the post-translational modifications of proteins to define system state and control cell function.

Current synthetic biological circuits make use of protein-DNA and RNA-RNA interactions to control gene expression in bacteria-- such circuits are examples of Transcrition-based Logic. A brief comparison of the two types of logic is as follows:


Transcription-based Logic

  • Engineered around gene expression
  • Typical parts: transcriptional regulators, translational regulators
  • Typical signal: PoPS, resulting in desired cellular concentrations of proteins.
  • Easier to engineer than PTL
  • Slow response time (hours)
  • Uses one subset of cellular functions


PTL

  • Engineered around protein modifications
  • Typical parts: kinases, phosphorylation sites, docking sites
  • Typical signa: rate of modification, resulting in desired state of proteins.
  • More difficult to engineer than Transcription-based logic.
  • Fast response time (seconds)
  • Explores a new set of applications


In designing PTL logic, I am working to answer the following questions:

  • What is a PTL part?
  • What is a PTL device?
  • What signals are passed between devices?
  • What are device performance specifications?

Below I will describe some of my ideas.


A Basic PTL System: Kinase-Kinase circuit

The most intuitive definition of a PTL device is illustrated as follows.


The problem with the above system is that the output of one device can only be received by a device that contains compatible Docking and PO4 parts. The figure below illustrates points of part-part interactions, with red line connecting parts that must be compatibile.


This trans-part compatibility defeats the purpose of a universal signal carrier, and limits the utility and versatility of PTL devices. Note that we encountered the same problem when defining PDL devices and signals.

A solution is to re-draw the device boundaries such that all corresponding parts are within the same devices:

Device 1 could be added upstream of any other device, and device part would be phosphorylated with maximal rate Vmax1.


Other types of devices: Localization

Phosphorylation controls many intracellular behaviors, including:

  • allosteric activation (described by the MAP Kinases above) or inhibition
  • translocation
  • degradation
  • protein complex formation
  • other binding events

One of the largest challenges facing PTL is finding a signal carrier that can descrbie all of the above functions.


As an example, let's examine nuclear localization:

Thus far, I have shown two useful signal carriers: Vmax and Vnuc. Let's examine how the two signal carriers could be integrated into one circuit.


Combining Vmax and Vnuc into one circuit

Here is an example of a kinase that modulates the rate of transport of a Protein into the nucleus:


We could imagine a circuit in which an input device phosphorylates a downstream device on two Phosphorylation sites, thus resulting in two distinctive output signals:


Other types signals we might want to define and measure