Ssutton: PTL Logic: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* What are device performance specifications? | * What are device performance specifications? | ||
Below I will describe some of my ideas. | |||
'''A Basic PTL System: Kinase-Kinase circuit''' | |||
The most intuitive definition of a PTL device is illustrated as follows. | The most intuitive definition of a PTL device is illustrated as follows. | ||
Line 42: | Line 43: | ||
This trans-part compatibility defeats the purpose of a universal signal carrier, and limits the utility and versatility of PTL devices. Note that we encountered the same problem when defining PDL devices and signals. | |||
A solution is to re-draw the device boundaries such that all corresponding parts are within the same devices: | A solution is to re-draw the device boundaries such that all corresponding parts are within the same devices: | ||
Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
[[Image:PTL text3.JPG|500px|center]] | [[Image:PTL text3.JPG|500px|center]] | ||
Device 1 could be added upstream of any other device, and device part would be phosphorylated with maximal rate Vmax1. | |||
'''Other types of devices: Localization''' | |||
Phosphorylation controls many intracellular behaviors, including: | |||
* allosteric activation (described by the MAP Kinases above) or inhibition | |||
* translocation | |||
* degradation | |||
* protein complex formation | |||
* other binding events | |||
One of the largest challenges facing PTL |
Revision as of 14:57, 12 January 2006
I am working to develop a new type of logic, called Post-Translational Logic, or PTL. PTL devices regulate the post-translational modifications of proteins to define system state and control cell function.
Current synthetic biological circuits make use of protein-DNA and RNA-RNA interactions to control gene expression in bacteria-- such circuits are Protein-DNA logic, or PDL. A brief comparison of the two types of logic is as follows:
PDL
- Engineered around gene expression
- Typical parts: transcriptional regulators, translational regulators
- Typical signal: PoPS, resulting in desired cellular concentrations of proteins.
- Easier to engineer than PTL
- Slow response time (hours)
- Uses one subset of cellular functions
PTL
- Engineered around protein modifications
- Typical parts: kinases, phosphorylation sites, docking sites
- Typical signa: rate of modification, resulting in desired state of proteins.
- More difficult to engineer than PDL
- Fast response time (seconds)
- Explores a new set of applications
In designing PTL logic, I am working to answer the following questions:
- What is a PTL part?
- What is a PTL device?
- What signals are passed between devices?
- What are device performance specifications?
Below I will describe some of my ideas.
A Basic PTL System: Kinase-Kinase circuit
The most intuitive definition of a PTL device is illustrated as follows.
The problem with the above system is that the output of one device can only be received by a device that contains compatible Docking and PO4 parts. The figure below illustrates points of part-part interactions, with red line connecting parts that must be compatibile.
This trans-part compatibility defeats the purpose of a universal signal carrier, and limits the utility and versatility of PTL devices. Note that we encountered the same problem when defining PDL devices and signals.
A solution is to re-draw the device boundaries such that all corresponding parts are within the same devices:
Device 1 could be added upstream of any other device, and device part would be phosphorylated with maximal rate Vmax1.
Other types of devices: Localization
Phosphorylation controls many intracellular behaviors, including:
- allosteric activation (described by the MAP Kinases above) or inhibition
- translocation
- degradation
- protein complex formation
- other binding events
One of the largest challenges facing PTL