Smolke:Journal Club: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
*I found the Ham et al. <cite>ham</cite> paper extremely disappointing. If you want an example of what not to do, it's a good one. But otherwise I'd skip it. -Josh | *I found the Ham et al. <cite>ham</cite> paper extremely disappointing. If you want an example of what not to do, it's a good one. But otherwise I'd skip it. -Josh | ||
*I suggested the Ham et al. <cite>ham</cite> mostly to throw out a paper about synthetic information processing in cells. It is outside my area of familiarity, but I think it could be interesting, especially since that is what the Endy lab is gearing up to attack. So if anyone else has a good recent paper on some synthetic biology approach to information processing, I think that might be cool for us to read and critique. -Mike | *I suggested the Ham et al. <cite>ham</cite> mostly to throw out a paper about synthetic information processing in cells. It is outside my area of familiarity, but I think it could be interesting, especially since that is what the Endy lab is gearing up to attack. So if anyone else has a good recent paper on some synthetic biology approach to information processing, I think that might be cool for us to read and critique. -Mike | ||
*7 and 8 can be reviewed together if anyone is interested. They are very similar (8 is kinda a modified version of 7). It's amazing that they | *7 and 8 can be reviewed together if anyone is interested. They are very similar (8 is kinda a modified version of 7). It's amazing that they got published in two high-profile journals. -Win | ||
==Voting on Papers== | ==Voting on Papers== |
Revision as of 22:34, 4 March 2009