SBB09Ntbk-VaiUmesh: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
==~~!~~==
Notes
=== ===


==[[User:JCAnderson|JCAnderson]] 13:51, 2 February 2009 (EST)==
==[[User:JCAnderson|JCAnderson]] 13:51, 2 February 2009 (EST)==
Line 221: Line 218:
  - N and C termini constructs were not verified to be correct
  - N and C termini constructs were not verified to be correct
  - But only the PCR was set up such that if the first two constructs were wrong, only the SOE-ing PCR step would be a waste
  - But only the PCR was set up such that if the first two constructs were wrong, only the SOE-ing PCR step would be a waste
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 4 March 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
Did not come into lab - Sick
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 6 March 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
- Today was a short day:
- Sequencing results came in - they worked! The first two constructs of the N and C termini were correct
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 9 March 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
- Since the first two constructs were verified to be correct, I proceeded with SOE-ing PCR
- Performed a zymo clean up of the PCR
- Did a restriction digest
- Ran the samples on a gel and gel purified the required fragments (cut out the bands with a razor before purification)
- Once fragments 'A' and 'B' were obtained (check construction file), a second PCR was set up with the SOE-ing oligos on A+B
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 11 March 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
- The PCR with A+B was purified and digested with EcoRI and BamHI
- Ligation was set up
- The construct was transformed into DH10B cells
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 13 March 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
- Today was a very short day:
- I picked a colony from the plates I had transformed and put it into the Shaker
- (Gabe said he would monitor the test tubes + miniprep my samples over the weekend)
- Plan - To send the samples in for sequencing first thing on Monday
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 16 March 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
- Sent sample in for sequencing. Nothing left to do except wait to see if it worked
- If it didnt, trouble shooting will begin!
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 18 March 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
- Sequencing came in: Clone was correct!!!
- The circularly permuted OmpX part (eCPX) was successfully made
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 20 April 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
'''Assigned Assay - Cell-cell adhesion'''
Plan:
- To transform RFP into DH10B cells
- These cels would be plated on Spec plates'
- Colonies would be picked from these plates and cultures grown - they would be co-transformed with the IILK and AG4 plasmids
- We will also make clones without the RFP plasmids
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 21 April 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
Jennifer did the following:
- Picked colonies into 24 well plate
- Used 3mL LB total
pBca9495CA-(M10218-M10225)
- A1 --> D1
- A2 --> D2
pBca9495CA-(M10210-M10217)
- A3 --> D3
- A4 --> D4
pBca9495CA-Bca1363
- A5
pBca1600-Bca1144 (RFP plasmid)
-  B5
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 22 April 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
- Performed 1:10 Dilutions
- 96-well plate: 1 mL of LB (with or without arabinose) and 100uL of saturated cell culture.
- In the V-bottom plate: 300uL of LB (with or without arabinose) and 30uL of saturated cell culture.
- The V-bottom plate would allow us to qualitatively assess whether any flocculation occurred.
- The 96-well plate was used because RFP measurements could easily be made using the Tecan.
</pre>
=='''[[User:Vaibhavi Umesh|Vaibhavi Umesh]] 27 April 2009 (EST)''':==
<pre>
- Due to inconclusive results,  certain parts were re-transformed.
- The idea of co-transforming with RFP was not used.
- Instead, it was decided that sodium hydroxide could be used to get rid of cell clumps from flocculation
- Breaking up the clumps was necessary to obtain an accurate concentration of cells.
</pre>
</pre>

Revision as of 12:48, 19 May 2009


JCAnderson 13:51, 2 February 2009 (EST)

Today I learned how to change a wiki page and made my pages.

Vaibhavi Umesh 2 February 2009 (EST):


- Recieved project ball --> OmpX
- Learned how to change a wiki page
- Made/edited personal page 

Things to do

- Make wiki notebook page
- Make personal page
- Read about circularly permuted plasmids
- Read paper about OmpX
- Begin working on construction file to design OmpX basic part

*Vaibhavi Umesh 4 February 2009 (EST):

- Everyone in class got Project Balls <br>
- Worked on Construction files for OmpX

Vaibhavi Umesh 6 February 2009 (EST):


- Worked on designing oligos and the construction file for the project parts


Vaibhavi Umesh 9 February 2009 (EST):

- Worked on designing oligos and the construction file for the project parts - This is what I designed based on reading the paper Chris had suggested:

1) Native N-terminus - OmpX                        {N.ompX!}

PCR VU015F/VU016R on OmpX                    (529 bp, EcoRI/BamHI)
Sub into pBca9145-Bca1144#5                       (EcoRI/BamHI, 2057+910, L)
Product is M10012                                          {N.ompX>}
-------------------------------------------
VU015F  Construction of OmpX N term part
ccaaaGAATTCatgAGATCTatgaaaaaaattgcatgtctttcagcactggccgc    (40% GC content, length = 55 bp)


VU016R  Construction of OmpX  N term part
gcaaaGGATCCttaaccggcaatccaggtgcctacg                                       (56% GC content, length = 36 bp)
---------


2) Native C-terminus - OmpX                                          {
AGATCTgttggttaccgcttctaaGGATCC


EIPCR VU017F /VU018R on pBca9145-Bca1144#5          (2090 bp, BglII)
Product is M10013                                                              { --------------------------------------------
VU017F      EIPCR construction of {C.OmpX>}       ccataAGATCTgttggttaccgcttctaaGGATCCtaaCTCGAGctgcag


VU018R    Reverse BglII oligo for His6 EIPCR   CCAATAGATCTcatgaattccagaaatc
   
-------------


Assemble the complete part by SOEing

Criteria for Linker between N and C terminus:

From the paper, I was able to extract the following information:
* The linker should be 6 peptides long
* The first peptide should be Glycine
* The third and sixth positions were restricted to R/K/S/H/Q/N
* The substitution A165V resulted in improved display scaffolds
* The substitution G166S resulted in improved display scaffolds
* The display enhancing substitutions A165V and G166S are located immediately upstream of the native C-terminus of OmpX
* The remaining positions (2 and 4) should be randomized

keeping all this in mind I thought the following linker would be best suited:
GSKNVS

which has a nucleotide sequence of: GGTTCTAAAAATGTTTCT

New N junction
gttggttaccgcttc

New C junction
aaaaaaattgcatgtctttc

Forward Oligo:

Linker.C junction
GGTTCTAAAAATGTTTCTaaaaaaattgcatgtctttc

Reverse Oligo:

N junction.Linker
gttggttaccgcttcGGTTCTAAAAATGTTTCT

Reverse Complement:
AGAAACATTTTTAGAACCgaagcggtaaccaac
 

PCR VU019F /VU016R on M10012                      (527 bp, gp A)
PCR VU017F/VU020R on M10013                       (44 bp, gp B)
PCR VU021F /VU016R on gp B + gp A                 (553 bp, EcoRI/BamHI)
Sub into pBca9145-Bca1144#5                              (EcoRI/BamHI, 2057+910, L)
Product is M10014                                                  { -------------------------
VU019F  Forward SOEing oligo for  cpOmpX
GGTTCTAAAAATGTTTCTaaaaaaattgcatgtctttc

VU020R  Reverse SOEing oligo for cpOmpX
AGAAACATTTTTAGAACCgaagcggtaaccaac

VU021F Forward construction of C.OmpX
ccataAGATCTgttggttaccgcttcGGTTCTAAAAATGTTTCT

Note: VU021F had to be used instead of re-using VU017 because VU017 was used to construct {C.OmpX>}  through EIPCR



Vaibhavi Umesh 10 February 2009 (EST):


- Project parts were due --> Contruction files
- Oligos will be ordered this week
- Chris said he would go through all the construction files and make corrections as necessary.


Vaibhavi Umesh 11 February 2009 (EST):

- Chris corrected the construction files:


1) Native C-terminal portion of ompX {N.ompX}

PCR Ovu015/Ovu016 on MG1655 gen.          (322bp, EcoRI/BamHI)
Sub into pBca9145-Bca1144#5               (EcoRI/BamHI, L)
Product is pBca9145-M10012	{N.cpx}
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ovu015	Construction of OmpX N term part	
ctagaGAATTCatgAGATCTGGTCAGTCTggtgactacaacaaaaaccag
Ovu016	Construction of OmpX N term part	
gacaaGGATCCgaagcggtaaccaacagaggcaatccaggtgcctac

2) Native N-terminal portion of ompX {C.ompX}

PCR Ovu017/Ovu018 on MG1655 gen.          (196bp, EcoRI/BamHI)
Sub into pBca9145-Bca1144#5               (EcoRI/BamHI, L)
Product is pBca9145-M10013	{C.cpx}
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ovu017	Construction of OmpX C term part	
ctagaGAATTCatgAGATCTgcgacttctactgtaactgg
Ovu018	Construction of OmpX C term part	
gacaaGGATCCttaagagcttgcagtacggcttttctcgg	

3) SOEing assembly of eCPX

PCR Ovu015/Ovu019 on pBca9145-M10012        (334bp, EcoRI/BamHI = A)
PCR Ovu020/Ovu018 on pBca9145-M10013        (194bp, EcoRI/BamHI = B)
PCR Ovu015/Ovu018 on A+B                    (505bp, EcoRI/BamHI)
Sub into pBca9145-Bca1144#5               (EcoRI/BamHI, L)
Product is pBca9495KC-M10014	{<eCPX!}
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ovu019	SOEing of eCPX	
gtcgcTTTAGACTGTTTAGATCCgaagcggtaaccaacag
Ovu020	SOEing of eCPX	
GGATCTAAACAGTCTAAAgcgacttctactgtaactgg			

Vaibhavi Umesh 18 February 2009 (EST):

 - Started Project!
 - Oligos came in - diluted all of them
 - Set up a PCR reaction

Vaibhavi Umesh 23 February 2009 (EST):

 - Ran an analytical gel to make sure pcr worked
 - Did a zymo clean up on the PCR product to obtain the required fragments
 - Digested the fragments with EcoRI and BamHI (according to the construction file)
 - Cleaned up the digest
* Did not have time to finish ligating and transforming. So, Digests were stored in the freezer until the next lab period

Vaibhavi Umesh 25 February 2009 (EST):

 - Ligated the digests from the last lab period - Feb 23rd
 - Transformed them into DH10B cells and put the plates in the incubator

Vaibhavi Umesh 27 February 2009 (EST):

 - Colonies were picked and grown out for us over the weekend
 - Today: Miniprepping!!!
 - I had a total of 4 miniprep samples: 2 of each kind (The N and C termini)
 - After miniprepping, a restriction mapping was performed to see if the samples should even be sent to the sequencing facility.
 - Restriction mapping: Worked!
 - Did not have time to send the samples for sequencing today - Will do them on the next lab period

Vaibhavi Umesh 2 March 2009 (EST):

 - Samples were sent in for sequencing
 - However, to avoid wasting time, the 3rd part of the construction file - SOE-ing PCR was started today 
 - N and C termini constructs were not verified to be correct
 - But only the PCR was set up such that if the first two constructs were wrong, only the SOE-ing PCR step would be a waste


Vaibhavi Umesh 4 March 2009 (EST):

Did not come into lab - Sick

Vaibhavi Umesh 6 March 2009 (EST):

 - Today was a short day:
 - Sequencing results came in - they worked! The first two constructs of the N and C termini were correct

Vaibhavi Umesh 9 March 2009 (EST):

 - Since the first two constructs were verified to be correct, I proceeded with SOE-ing PCR
 - Performed a zymo clean up of the PCR
 - Did a restriction digest
 - Ran the samples on a gel and gel purified the required fragments (cut out the bands with a razor before purification)
 - Once fragments 'A' and 'B' were obtained (check construction file), a second PCR was set up with the SOE-ing oligos on A+B

Vaibhavi Umesh 11 March 2009 (EST):

 - The PCR with A+B was purified and digested with EcoRI and BamHI
 - Ligation was set up
 - The construct was transformed into DH10B cells

Vaibhavi Umesh 13 March 2009 (EST):

 - Today was a very short day:
 - I picked a colony from the plates I had transformed and put it into the Shaker
 - (Gabe said he would monitor the test tubes + miniprep my samples over the weekend)
 - Plan - To send the samples in for sequencing first thing on Monday

Vaibhavi Umesh 16 March 2009 (EST):

 - Sent sample in for sequencing. Nothing left to do except wait to see if it worked
 - If it didnt, trouble shooting will begin!

Vaibhavi Umesh 18 March 2009 (EST):

 - Sequencing came in: Clone was correct!!!
 - The circularly permuted OmpX part (eCPX) was successfully made

Vaibhavi Umesh 20 April 2009 (EST):

'''Assigned Assay - Cell-cell adhesion'''
Plan:
- To transform RFP into DH10B cells
- These cels would be plated on Spec plates'
- Colonies would be picked from these plates and cultures grown - they would be co-transformed with the IILK and AG4 plasmids
 - We will also make clones without the RFP plasmids


Vaibhavi Umesh 21 April 2009 (EST):

Jennifer did the following:
 - Picked colonies into 24 well plate
 - Used 3mL LB total

pBca9495CA-(M10218-M10225)
 - A1 --> D1
 - A2 --> D2

pBca9495CA-(M10210-M10217)
 - A3 --> D3
 - A4 --> D4

pBca9495CA-Bca1363
 - A5

pBca1600-Bca1144 (RFP plasmid)
 -  B5 


Vaibhavi Umesh 22 April 2009 (EST):

 - Performed 1:10 Dilutions

 - 96-well plate: 1 mL of LB (with or without arabinose) and 100uL of saturated cell culture. 

 - In the V-bottom plate: 300uL of LB (with or without arabinose) and 30uL of saturated cell culture.

 - The V-bottom plate would allow us to qualitatively assess whether any flocculation occurred. 
 - The 96-well plate was used because RFP measurements could easily be made using the Tecan.

Vaibhavi Umesh 27 April 2009 (EST):



 - Due to inconclusive results,  certain parts were re-transformed. 
 - The idea of co-transforming with RFP was not used. 
 - Instead, it was decided that sodium hydroxide could be used to get rid of cell clumps from flocculation
 - Breaking up the clumps was necessary to obtain an accurate concentration of cells.