Publishing Group: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Barry Canton (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#[[Natalie Kuldell| Natalie]] | #[[Natalie Kuldell| Natalie]] | ||
#[[Austin Che]] | #[[Austin Che]] | ||
#[[Jason Kelly|Jason]] | |||
Things to discuss: | Things to discuss: | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
#What existing journals are the most appropriate/receptive venues for publication of SB work? | #What existing journals are the most appropriate/receptive venues for publication of SB work? | ||
#How is publishing on SB topics different from any other field? | #How is publishing on SB topics different from any other field? | ||
#What are the other (if any) alternate publishing models already out there? | |||
#<your question/idea> | #<your question/idea> | ||
Revision as of 12:42, 23 September 2005
There's been some rolling discussion of how research publishing should work (i.e., might be improved), especially as it relates to Synthetic Biology.
I'd like to propose a BYO working lunch on Thursday October 6 from noon to 1:30p to discuss current thoughts.
If this date/time don't work, please suggest another date time (before October 10).
Please add your name to the list if you will attend.
Please add your ideas/questions below that you would like to discuss.
Attending:
Things to discuss:
- Do we need a Synthetic Biology specific journal?
- Does the peer review process, as practiced work?
- Is peer review needed for engineering research articles?
- What features would we like for our papers? Reader comments? Reader Wiki?
- How should the structure of a paper be changed to reflect things like, well, the Internets?
- What existing journals are the most appropriate/receptive venues for publication of SB work?
- How is publishing on SB topics different from any other field?
- What are the other (if any) alternate publishing models already out there?
- <your question/idea>
