Publishing Group: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Barry Canton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Attending: | Attending: | ||
#[[Drew_Endy | Drew]] | #[[Drew_Endy | Drew]] | ||
#[[Barry Canton|BC]] | |||
Things to discuss: | Things to discuss: | ||
#Do we a Synthetic Biology specific journal? | #Do we need a Synthetic Biology specific journal? | ||
#Does the peer review process, as practiced work? | #Does the peer review process, as practiced work? | ||
#Is peer review needed for engineering research articles? | #Is peer review needed for engineering research articles? |
Revision as of 08:53, 23 September 2005
There's been some rolling discussion of how research publishing should work (i.e., might be improved), especially as it relates to Synthetic Biology.
I'd like to propose a BYO working lunch on Thursday October 6 from noon to 1:30p to discuss current thoughts.
If this date/time don't work, please suggest another date time (before October 10).
Please add your name to the list if you will attend.
Please add your ideas/questions below that you would like to discuss.
Attending:
Things to discuss:
- Do we need a Synthetic Biology specific journal?
- Does the peer review process, as practiced work?
- Is peer review needed for engineering research articles?
- What features would we like for our papers? Reader comments? Reader Wiki?
- How should the structure of a paper be changed to reflect things like, well, the Internets?
- <your question/idea>