Publishing Group: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There's been some rolling discussion of how research publishing should work (i.e., might be improved), especially as it relates to Synthetic Biology. I'd like to propose a BYO working lunch on October 6 from noon to 1:30p to discuss current thoughts. | There's been some rolling discussion of how research publishing should work (i.e., might be improved), especially as it relates to Synthetic Biology. | ||
I'd like to propose a BYO working lunch on October 6 from noon to 1:30p to discuss current thoughts. | |||
Please add your name to the list if you will attend.<br> | Please add your name to the list if you will attend.<br> | ||
Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
Attending: | Attending: | ||
[[Drew_Endy]] | #[[Drew_Endy]] | ||
Things to discuss: | |||
#Do we a Synthetic Biology specific journal? | |||
#Does the peer review process, as practiced work? | |||
#Is peer review needed for engineering research articles? | |||
#What features would we like for our papers? Reader comments? Reader Wiki? | |||
#How should the structure of a paper be changed to reflect things like, well, the Internets? | |||
#<your question/idea> |
Revision as of 08:41, 23 September 2005
There's been some rolling discussion of how research publishing should work (i.e., might be improved), especially as it relates to Synthetic Biology.
I'd like to propose a BYO working lunch on October 6 from noon to 1:30p to discuss current thoughts.
Please add your name to the list if you will attend.
Please add your ideas/questions below that you would like to discuss.
If the date/time don't work, please suggest another date time (before October 10).
Attending:
Things to discuss:
- Do we a Synthetic Biology specific journal?
- Does the peer review process, as practiced work?
- Is peer review needed for engineering research articles?
- What features would we like for our papers? Reader comments? Reader Wiki?
- How should the structure of a paper be changed to reflect things like, well, the Internets?
- <your question/idea>