Physics307L F09:People/Trujillo/LAB NOTEBOOK/071114: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→DATA) |
m (1 revision) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 18:58, 6 August 2010
Excitation Levels of Neon
Vf = 2 V
| Voltage | Current (uA) | Voltage | Current |
| 12.00 V | .166 microA | ||
| 12.25 | .166 | ||
| 12.50 | .173 | ||
| 12.75 | .177 | ||
| 13.00 | .182 | ||
| 13.25 | .186 | ||
| 13.50 | .190 | ||
| 13.25 | .194 | ||
| 14.00 | .197 | ||
| 14.25 | .202 | ||
| 14.50 | .204 | ||
| 14.75 | .207 | ||
| 15.00 | .210 | ||
| 15.25 | .212 | ||
| 15.50 | .214 | ||
| 15.75 | .216 | ||
| 16.00 | .217 | ||
| 16.25 | .221 | ||
| 16.50 | .221 | ||
| 16.75 | .222 | ||
| 17.00 | .220 | ||
| 17.25 | .213 | ||
| 17.50 | .116 | ||
| 17.75 | .119 | ||
| 18.00 | .385 | ||
| 18.25 | .457 | ||
| 18.50 | .561 | ||
| 18.75 | .805 | ||
| 19.00 | .911 | ||
| 19.25 | .981 | ||
| 19.50 | 1.06 | ||
| 19.75 | 1.143 | ||
| 20.00 | 1.213 | ||
| 20.25 | 1.295 | ||
| 20.50 | 1.386 | ||
| 20.75 | 1.453 | ||
| 21.00 | 1.544 | ||
| 21.25 | 1.639 | ||
| 21.50 | 1.735 | ||
| 21.75 | 1.834 | ||
| 22.00 | 1.933 | ||
| 22.25 | 1.84 | ||
| 22.50 | 2.02 | ||
| 22.75 | 2.25 | ||
| 23.00 | 2.50 | ||
| 23.25 | 2.78 | ||
| 23.50 | 3.07 | ||
| 23.75 | 3.36 | ||
| 24.00 | 3.65 | ||
| 24.25 | 3.99 | ||
| 24.50 | 4.30 | ||
| 24.75 | 4.63 | ||
| 25.00 | 4.96 | ||
| 25.25 | 5.28 | ||
| 25.50 | 5.63 | ||
| 25.75 | 5.99 | ||
| 26.00 | 6.33 | ||
| 26.25 | 6.68 | ||
| 26.50 | 7.05 | ||
| 26.75 | 7.43 | ||
| 27.00 | 7.81 | ||
| 27.25 | 8.21 | ||
| 27.50 | 8.52 | ||
| 27.75 | 8.96 | ||
| 28.00 | 9.37 | ||
| 28.25 | 9.74 | ||
| 28.50 | 10.13 | ||
| 28.75 | 10.52 | ||
| 29.00 | 10.89 | ||
| 29.25 | 11.32 | ||
| 29.50 | 11.76 | ||
| 29.75 | 12.16 | ||
| 30.00 | 12.57 |
DATA
Tomas and i decided to retake the data that I previously took with Antonio and Brian because we thought the set up might be wrong. We were not able to get he curves that Dr Gold had on example so we still think there is something weird going on. From the data you could see that we shortened the data increments so we would not miss the excitation levels. Unfortunately we were not able to find the all the excitation levels, I dont know if we had to have even smaller increment or if we are analyzing the data wrong.. DAM
