Physics307L:Schedule/Week 2 agenda/Small group exercise: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
*#  I'll collect them and then we'll argue as a group about what is most important
*#  I'll collect them and then we'll argue as a group about what is most important


==Results==
==Brainstorming Results==
These are the items that groups felt important enough to email or text to me.
* Know the main goal of ur research
* Know the main goal of ur research
* Communication skills
* Communication skills
Line 42: Line 43:


== Nominations for critical ==
== Nominations for critical ==
These are the items that at least one student nominated from the above list.  Student was required to make a little argument as to why.  After nominations were set, we did voting.  Round 1 was two votes / person, vote for any item.  Round 2 was two votes per person, only considering the 3 highest from round one.
* Safety -- so you don't die
* Safety -- so you don't die
**
**Round 1 votes:  0
* Adequate controls -- you won't know what you're measuring
* Adequate controls -- you won't know what you're measuring
** 1
** Round 1 votes: 1
* Reproducibility -- If you can't reproduce someone else's work, what is that work worth?
* Reproducibility -- If you can't reproduce someone else's work, what is that work worth?
** 11
** Round 1 votes: 11
*** 15
*** Round 2 votes: 15
* Objective / aware of biases -- so the work is actually useful
* Objective / aware of biases -- so the work is actually useful
** 7
** Round 1 votes: 7
*** 9
*** Round 2 votes: 9
* Intellectual honesty -- if you don't cite properly you might as well be stealing
* Intellectual honesty -- if you don't cite properly you might as well be stealing
** 3
** Round 1 votes: 3
* Patience -- if you give up the first time it doesn't work, there will never be progress
* Patience -- if you give up the first time it doesn't work, there will never be progress
** 2
** Round 1 votes: 2
* Asks questions -- without curiosity there is no science at all
* Asks questions -- without curiosity there is no science at all
** Modified to "Asks the right questions" -- relevant / not getting distracted
** Modified to "Asks the right questions" -- relevant / not getting distracted
** Creativity
** Creativity
***  Ask creative questions that are relevant and answer them in creative ways that are most productive
***  Ask creative questions that are relevant and answer them in creative ways that are most productive
**** 6   
**** Round 1 votes: 6   
***** 10
***** Round 2 votes: 10
* Sharing information -- to save time so different groups don't repeat unnecessarily
* Sharing information -- to save time so different groups don't repeat unnecessarily
** 2
** Round 1 votes: 2

Revision as of 16:13, 30 August 2010

  • Goals
    • Learn something about what makes "good" science
    • Get used to talking and contributing to class discussions
  • Task
    1. Make small groups of 2 or at most 3 people
    2. Brainstorm about what necessary things you need to do in order to perform a "good" scientific study.
    3. After about 5 minutes, pick your favorites and email or txt them to me (txt 505-750-3279)
    4. I'll collect them and then we'll argue as a group about what is most important

Brainstorming Results

These are the items that groups felt important enough to email or text to me.

  • Know the main goal of ur research
  • Communication skills
  • Data organization
  • Keep track of what u do by writing
  • Be careful to be precise and accurate
  • Be creative
  • Be curious about the problem. U discover more
  • Don't be afraid to make a mistake
  • Safety first
  • Know ur equipment and how to use it
  • Use your time efficiently
  • Don't change too many variables at once
  • Do a lot of planning, for good procedure* Transperancy, error analysis, citations, objectivity
  • honest representation
  • reproducibility
  • relevance of work
  • Design experiments such that the number of unknowns is

minimized

  • Make sure no personal bias toward the results is
  • Repeatable
  • Can be observed and / or measured
  • Is readily available to the public
  • Asks questions
  • Is patient
  • Finds a reproducible experiment

present

  • Open lines of communication
  • Intellectual honesty
  • Have a clear objective Have adequate controls Have detailed record of observations have properly functioning equipment Avoid any bias in measurements
  • withstand rigid experimental disproof

Nominations for critical

These are the items that at least one student nominated from the above list. Student was required to make a little argument as to why. After nominations were set, we did voting. Round 1 was two votes / person, vote for any item. Round 2 was two votes per person, only considering the 3 highest from round one.

  • Safety -- so you don't die
    • Round 1 votes: 0
  • Adequate controls -- you won't know what you're measuring
    • Round 1 votes: 1
  • Reproducibility -- If you can't reproduce someone else's work, what is that work worth?
    • Round 1 votes: 11
      • Round 2 votes: 15
  • Objective / aware of biases -- so the work is actually useful
    • Round 1 votes: 7
      • Round 2 votes: 9
  • Intellectual honesty -- if you don't cite properly you might as well be stealing
    • Round 1 votes: 3
  • Patience -- if you give up the first time it doesn't work, there will never be progress
    • Round 1 votes: 2
  • Asks questions -- without curiosity there is no science at all
    • Modified to "Asks the right questions" -- relevant / not getting distracted
    • Creativity
      • Ask creative questions that are relevant and answer them in creative ways that are most productive
        • Round 1 votes: 6
          • Round 2 votes: 10
  • Sharing information -- to save time so different groups don't repeat unnecessarily
    • Round 1 votes: 2