Physics307L:Schedule/Week 2 agenda/Small group exercise: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*# I'll collect them and then we'll argue as a group about what is most important | *# I'll collect them and then we'll argue as a group about what is most important | ||
==Results== | ==Brainstorming Results== | ||
These are the items that groups felt important enough to email or text to me. | |||
* Know the main goal of ur research | * Know the main goal of ur research | ||
* Communication skills | * Communication skills | ||
Line 42: | Line 43: | ||
== Nominations for critical == | == Nominations for critical == | ||
These are the items that at least one student nominated from the above list. Student was required to make a little argument as to why. After nominations were set, we did voting. Round 1 was two votes / person, vote for any item. Round 2 was two votes per person, only considering the 3 highest from round one. | |||
* Safety -- so you don't die | * Safety -- so you don't die | ||
** | **Round 1 votes: 0 | ||
* Adequate controls -- you won't know what you're measuring | * Adequate controls -- you won't know what you're measuring | ||
** 1 | ** Round 1 votes: 1 | ||
* Reproducibility -- If you can't reproduce someone else's work, what is that work worth? | * Reproducibility -- If you can't reproduce someone else's work, what is that work worth? | ||
** 11 | ** Round 1 votes: 11 | ||
*** 15 | *** Round 2 votes: 15 | ||
* Objective / aware of biases -- so the work is actually useful | * Objective / aware of biases -- so the work is actually useful | ||
** 7 | ** Round 1 votes: 7 | ||
*** 9 | *** Round 2 votes: 9 | ||
* Intellectual honesty -- if you don't cite properly you might as well be stealing | * Intellectual honesty -- if you don't cite properly you might as well be stealing | ||
** 3 | ** Round 1 votes: 3 | ||
* Patience -- if you give up the first time it doesn't work, there will never be progress | * Patience -- if you give up the first time it doesn't work, there will never be progress | ||
** 2 | ** Round 1 votes: 2 | ||
* Asks questions -- without curiosity there is no science at all | * Asks questions -- without curiosity there is no science at all | ||
** Modified to "Asks the right questions" -- relevant / not getting distracted | ** Modified to "Asks the right questions" -- relevant / not getting distracted | ||
** Creativity | ** Creativity | ||
*** Ask creative questions that are relevant and answer them in creative ways that are most productive | *** Ask creative questions that are relevant and answer them in creative ways that are most productive | ||
**** 6 | **** Round 1 votes: 6 | ||
***** 10 | ***** Round 2 votes: 10 | ||
* Sharing information -- to save time so different groups don't repeat unnecessarily | * Sharing information -- to save time so different groups don't repeat unnecessarily | ||
** 2 | ** Round 1 votes: 2 |
Revision as of 16:13, 30 August 2010
- Goals
- Learn something about what makes "good" science
- Get used to talking and contributing to class discussions
- Task
- Make small groups of 2 or at most 3 people
- Brainstorm about what necessary things you need to do in order to perform a "good" scientific study.
- After about 5 minutes, pick your favorites and email or txt them to me (txt 505-750-3279)
- I'll collect them and then we'll argue as a group about what is most important
Brainstorming Results
These are the items that groups felt important enough to email or text to me.
- Know the main goal of ur research
- Communication skills
- Data organization
- Keep track of what u do by writing
- Be careful to be precise and accurate
- Be creative
- Be curious about the problem. U discover more
- Don't be afraid to make a mistake
- Safety first
- Know ur equipment and how to use it
- Use your time efficiently
- Don't change too many variables at once
- Do a lot of planning, for good procedure* Transperancy, error analysis, citations, objectivity
- honest representation
- reproducibility
- relevance of work
- Design experiments such that the number of unknowns is
minimized
- Make sure no personal bias toward the results is
- Repeatable
- Can be observed and / or measured
- Is readily available to the public
- Asks questions
- Is patient
- Finds a reproducible experiment
present
- Open lines of communication
- Intellectual honesty
- Have a clear objective Have adequate controls Have detailed record of observations have properly functioning equipment Avoid any bias in measurements
- withstand rigid experimental disproof
Nominations for critical
These are the items that at least one student nominated from the above list. Student was required to make a little argument as to why. After nominations were set, we did voting. Round 1 was two votes / person, vote for any item. Round 2 was two votes per person, only considering the 3 highest from round one.
- Safety -- so you don't die
- Round 1 votes: 0
- Adequate controls -- you won't know what you're measuring
- Round 1 votes: 1
- Reproducibility -- If you can't reproduce someone else's work, what is that work worth?
- Round 1 votes: 11
- Round 2 votes: 15
- Round 1 votes: 11
- Objective / aware of biases -- so the work is actually useful
- Round 1 votes: 7
- Round 2 votes: 9
- Round 1 votes: 7
- Intellectual honesty -- if you don't cite properly you might as well be stealing
- Round 1 votes: 3
- Patience -- if you give up the first time it doesn't work, there will never be progress
- Round 1 votes: 2
- Asks questions -- without curiosity there is no science at all
- Modified to "Asks the right questions" -- relevant / not getting distracted
- Creativity
- Ask creative questions that are relevant and answer them in creative ways that are most productive
- Round 1 votes: 6
- Round 2 votes: 10
- Round 1 votes: 6
- Ask creative questions that are relevant and answer them in creative ways that are most productive
- Sharing information -- to save time so different groups don't repeat unnecessarily
- Round 1 votes: 2