Peyton:Publications: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
'''
'''


1. '''S.R. Peyton''', Z.I. Kalcioglu, J.D. Cohen, A.P. Runkle, K.J. VanVliet, D.A. Lauffenburger, and L.G. Griffith (''submitted'') “Stem cell motility in 3D synthetic scaffold is governed by matrix geometry along with adhesivity and stiffness.”  
1. '''S.R. Peyton''', Z.I. Kalcioglu, J.D. Cohen, A.P. Runkle, K.J. VanVliet, D.A. Lauffenburger, and L.G. Griffith (2011) “Marrow-Derived stem cell motility in 3D synthetic scaffold is governed by geometry along with adhesivity and stiffness.” Biotechnol Bioeng. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21191996 Pubmed]


2. C.M. Williams, G. Mehta, '''S.R. Peyton''', A.S. Zeiger, K.J. VanVliet, and L.G. Griffith (''in revision'') “Micropatterned semi-synthetic hydrogel arrays create a 3D niche for autocrine-induced tissue formation.”
2. C.M. Williams, G. Mehta, '''S.R. Peyton''', A.S. Zeiger, K.J. VanVliet, and L.G. Griffith (2011) “Autocrine-controlled formation and function of tissue-like aggregates by primary hepatocytes in micropatterned hydrogel arrays.” Tissue Engineering.  [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21121876 Pubmed]


'''
'''

Revision as of 09:26, 23 January 2011

Home                                                                                      Internal   


Peyton Publications in PubMed

2011

1. S.R. Peyton, Z.I. Kalcioglu, J.D. Cohen, A.P. Runkle, K.J. VanVliet, D.A. Lauffenburger, and L.G. Griffith (2011) “Marrow-Derived stem cell motility in 3D synthetic scaffold is governed by geometry along with adhesivity and stiffness.” Biotechnol Bioeng. Pubmed

2. C.M. Williams, G. Mehta, S.R. Peyton, A.S. Zeiger, K.J. VanVliet, and L.G. Griffith (2011) “Autocrine-controlled formation and function of tissue-like aggregates by primary hepatocytes in micropatterned hydrogel arrays.” Tissue Engineering. Pubmed

2009

3. P.D. Kim, S.R. Peyton, A.J. VanStrien, and A.J. Putnam (2009) “The influence of ascorbic acid, TGF-β1, and cell-mediated remodeling on the bulk mechanical properties of 3-D PEG-fibrinogen constructs.” Biomaterials. Aug;30(23-24):3854-64 Pubmed

4. C.B. Khatiwala, P.D. Kim, S.R. Peyton, and A.J. Putnam (2009) “ECM compliance regulates osteogenesis by influencing MAPK signaling downstream of RhoA and ROCK.” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. May;24(5):886-98. Pubmed

2008

5. S.R. Peyton, P.D. Kim, C.M. Ghajar, D. Seliktar, and A.J. Putnam (2008) “The effects of matrix stiffness and RhoA on the phenotypic plasticity of smooth muscle cells in a 3-D biosynthetic hydrogel system.” Biomaterials. Jun:29(17):2597-607. Pubmed

2007

6. C.B. Khatiwala, S.R. Peyton, and A.J. Putnam. (2007) “The regulation of osteogenesis by ECM rigidity in MC3T3-E1 cells requires MAPK activation.” Journal of Cellular Physiology. 211: 661-672. Pubmed

7. S.R. Peyton, C.M. Ghajar, C.B. Khatiwala, and A.J. Putnam. (2007) “The emergence of ECM mechanics and cytoskeletal tension as important regulators of cell function.” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. Apr;47(2):300–320. Pubmed

8. C.M. Ghajar, V. Suresh, S.R. Peyton, C.B. Raub, F.L. Meyskens Jr., S.C. George, and A.J. Putnam. (2007) “A novel 3-D model to quantify metastatic melanoma invasion.” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. Feb;6(2):552-561. Pubmed

2006

9. S.R. Peyton, C.B. Raub, V.P. Keschrumrus, and A.J. Putnam. (2006) “The use of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels to investigate the impact of ECM chemistry and mechanics on smooth muscle cells.” Biomaterials. Oct;27(28):4881-93. Pubmed

10. C. Khatiwala, S.R. Peyton, and A.J. Putnam. (2006) “Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells.” AJP-Cell Physiology. 290(6):C1640-50. Pubmed

2005

11. S.R. Peyton and A.J. Putnam. (2005) “Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion.” Journal of Cellular Physiology. 204(1):198-209. Pubmed