OpenWetWare talk:Hiring: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(added fostering community comment) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
At the end of the day, I see that person as someone with a lot of people skills (often over the internet, to ease the task ...), with a good sense of organization and coordination. | At the end of the day, I see that person as someone with a lot of people skills (often over the internet, to ease the task ...), with a good sense of organization and coordination. | ||
--[[User:Reidw|reid]] 21:57, 11 December 2006 (EST) Regarding fostering community, I think this is important, but it's not totally clear how someone would foster community. Do people have specific ideas/examples? One that comes to mind (which may or may not fall here exactly) is to have a nice page with publicity materials ready to go: oww posters, how to order business cards, link to a tour of oww, etc. |
Revision as of 19:57, 11 December 2006
--Vincent 14:11, 5 December 2006 (EST): Following the meeting on Hiring someone:
From a User perspective,it would be great if that person could be at least a 50% 'Facilitator' for the OWW community. 'Facilitator' meaning that this person would try to address issues related to:
- Building a stronger sense of community with OWW
- Improving visibility of available resources within the community (knowledge, technical skills, experimental skills ...)
- Helping people willing to contribute to get involved (visibility of on-going projects, be able to point current OWW trends and active discussions)
- animate and coordinate sub-OWW-communities:
- Administration
- Implementation of extensions
- Consensus Protocol editors
- Scientific writers
- ...
- The 'Facilitator' would support these open-groups to define their mission, short and long term goals, organize their conference-call meeting once a month, define their deliverables and chase them 'gently' to fulfill what they agreed on (no need of much technical knowledge, just someone to go through a check list and make sure that all networks are up-to-date.
I agree that this person should also be able to communicate outside of the OWW community. It would be good to have that person producing communication tools/documents to liaise with:
- Funding bodies
- General public and scientific Media
- Other communities of people having skills or experience in fields where OWW needs to strengthen (programmer is an obvious example)
At the end of the day, I see that person as someone with a lot of people skills (often over the internet, to ease the task ...), with a good sense of organization and coordination.
--reid 21:57, 11 December 2006 (EST) Regarding fostering community, I think this is important, but it's not totally clear how someone would foster community. Do people have specific ideas/examples? One that comes to mind (which may or may not fall here exactly) is to have a nice page with publicity materials ready to go: oww posters, how to order business cards, link to a tour of oww, etc.