OpenWetWare:Steering committee/Town Hall Meeting/2008/08/14: Difference between revisions
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Welcome to the OWW Community Town Hall Meeting for August, 2008== | ==Welcome to the OWW Community Town Hall Meeting for August, 2008== | ||
Teleconference dial-in number: 1-617-324-7374. | |||
Use these URL's to get to the chat room if you can't get there from here: | Use these URL's to get to the chat room if you can't get there from here: | ||
| Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
==This month's topic: '''Curation of content on OWW'''== | ==This month's topic: '''Curation of content on OWW'''== | ||
Useful, accurate information on OWW is something we all aspire to, so let's explore the idea of community-based content curation. If one person's "finished" protocol is another person's starting point, how do we ensure that the information in our protocols, and other how-to pages is as good as it can be... | |||
Please add your ideas, comments, or suggestions here. | Please add your ideas, comments, or suggestions here. | ||
*'''[[User:Jason R. Kelly|Jason R. Kelly]] 21:30, 12 August 2008 (EDT):''' Would be great to try to brainstorm ways that curation could be a way to ''encourage'' contribution rather than something that prevents it. How do we avoid curation that serves as a gatekeeper lowering overall content contribution - for instance the inabilty to comment in genbank? Curation can also be a way to encourage contribution - for instance, by creating academic credit via a "stamp of approval" (a la peer-reviewed journals). Seems a tough balance to strike. | |||
== Follow-up Topics== | == Follow-up Topics== | ||
Latest revision as of 18:32, 12 August 2008
Welcome to the OWW Community Town Hall Meeting for August, 2008
Teleconference dial-in number: 1-617-324-7374.
Use these URL's to get to the chat room if you can't get there from here:
- room url: Room URL
- embed url: Embedded URL
This month's topic: Curation of content on OWW
Useful, accurate information on OWW is something we all aspire to, so let's explore the idea of community-based content curation. If one person's "finished" protocol is another person's starting point, how do we ensure that the information in our protocols, and other how-to pages is as good as it can be...
Please add your ideas, comments, or suggestions here.
- Jason R. Kelly 21:30, 12 August 2008 (EDT): Would be great to try to brainstorm ways that curation could be a way to encourage contribution rather than something that prevents it. How do we avoid curation that serves as a gatekeeper lowering overall content contribution - for instance the inabilty to comment in genbank? Curation can also be a way to encourage contribution - for instance, by creating academic credit via a "stamp of approval" (a la peer-reviewed journals). Seems a tough balance to strike.
Follow-up Topics
Other Links Cited
Chat
<html>
<div style="width:800px"> <style> .mcrmeebo { display: block; background:url("http://widget.meebo.com/r.gif") no-repeat top right; } .mcrmeebo:hover { background:url("http://widget.meebo.com/ro.gif") no-repeat top right; } </style>
<object width="800" height="600" > <param name="movie" value="http://widget.meebo.com/mcr.swf?id=dGvMJJZSoQ"/> <embed src="http://widget.meebo.com/mcr.swf?id=dGvMJJZSoQ"
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="800" height="600" />
</object>
<a href="http://www.meebo.com/rooms" class="mcrmeebo"> <img alt="http://www.meebo.com/rooms" src="http://widget.meebo.com/b.gif" width="800" height="90" style="border:0px"/> </a>
</div> </html>
