OpenWetWare:Steering committee/Goals: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Short term goals== | ==Short term goals== | ||
===Define a long-term organizational structure for OWW leadership=== | |||
*The new structure will be decided upon in December, and new officers will be elected in January. | |||
===Encourage the growth of (a wide variety) of communities on OWW=== | |||
*The reasoning here is that the most important thing is to continue to build a critical mass of users who are comfortable using the site in their daily research. Then if we want to role out more complicated things in the future we’ve got a user base to actually try them out with (and a userbase to suggest/develop new things in the first place). I think Jay's point at the retreat about wikis being included in OS 12, and the follow up discussion about how OWW is not principally a tool site supports this focus - the strength of OWW will be in the community of users that we've grown. | |||
*List of communities that would fit on OWW and brief examples of projects we could prioritize in support of them. | |||
*#Labs | |||
*#*tutorial for adding custom recent changes for your lab | |||
*#Courses | |||
*#Research fields (e.g. fanconi anemia, synthetic biology) | |||
*#*Improved discussion areas? | |||
*#*Lab RSS feeds | |||
*#Institutions | |||
*#*Could build up the MIT isntitution page (e.g. list all shared equipment, etc) as an example for other institutions to model after | |||
*#Resource Centers (e.g. MIT flow facility, Caltech Microfluidic Foundry) | |||
*#*Provides a great opportunity for the user community of one of a resource center to troubleshoot and interact with the employees of the center. The caltech foundry has already expressed some interest in this, and I think it would be a great fit for the MIT flow facility as well. | |||
==Medium term goals== | ==Medium term goals== |
Revision as of 00:18, 9 August 2006
- Jasonk 03:09, 9 August 2006 (EDT): At the retreat we decided that the steering committee would be responsible for prioritizing the areas where OWW would expend resources (whether time or $). To serve this I think we need to have a list of short-term goals. (and probably a long-term vision as well)
- Since we are putting in place an organizational structure for the next 6 months, it seems like that is a good time frame for some short term goals.
Short term goals
Define a long-term organizational structure for OWW leadership
- The new structure will be decided upon in December, and new officers will be elected in January.
Encourage the growth of (a wide variety) of communities on OWW
- The reasoning here is that the most important thing is to continue to build a critical mass of users who are comfortable using the site in their daily research. Then if we want to role out more complicated things in the future we’ve got a user base to actually try them out with (and a userbase to suggest/develop new things in the first place). I think Jay's point at the retreat about wikis being included in OS 12, and the follow up discussion about how OWW is not principally a tool site supports this focus - the strength of OWW will be in the community of users that we've grown.
- List of communities that would fit on OWW and brief examples of projects we could prioritize in support of them.
- Labs
- tutorial for adding custom recent changes for your lab
- Courses
- Research fields (e.g. fanconi anemia, synthetic biology)
- Improved discussion areas?
- Lab RSS feeds
- Institutions
- Could build up the MIT isntitution page (e.g. list all shared equipment, etc) as an example for other institutions to model after
- Resource Centers (e.g. MIT flow facility, Caltech Microfluidic Foundry)
- Provides a great opportunity for the user community of one of a resource center to troubleshoot and interact with the employees of the center. The caltech foundry has already expressed some interest in this, and I think it would be a great fit for the MIT flow facility as well.
- Labs