OpenWetWare:Information management/Standard protocol submission/Meeting - 7/6/06: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Time/Location== | |||
*Time: 12-1 EST, 7/6/06 | |||
*Location: 32-262 (Stata Center) | |||
We will be discussing ways to standardize protocol submission to be easily submit-able, read-able, and search-able on OWW. Notes and discussion pages will be updated post-meeting --feel free to provide your input on upcoming discussions! | |||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
===Template=== | ===Template=== | ||
Revision as of 08:55, 5 July 2006
Time/Location
- Time: 12-1 EST, 7/6/06
- Location: 32-262 (Stata Center)
We will be discussing ways to standardize protocol submission to be easily submit-able, read-able, and search-able on OWW. Notes and discussion pages will be updated post-meeting --feel free to provide your input on upcoming discussions!
Agenda
Template
- Template needs to:
- Provide Background
- Collect different versions of a given protocol
- Allow for comparison of those versions
- Provide some sort of forum for discussion/comments/questions (see below)
- Suggested Template
- Multiple templates for flexibility or maybe several sub-templates so you can pick-and-choose?
- Template Includes (searchable Keywords possible?)
- User Friendly (Can we make this template easy to follow?)
- Print Friendly
Aggregation
- How do we optimize the process/format to maximize the number of protocols we can get.
User Input
- We need a way for users to comment on protocols as well as ask questions, get debugging help, and have discussions.
- We want these discussions to be archived and searchable.
- Is the wiki the best format?
- It may be cumbersome when the discussion gets large
Categorize/Tag
- Tutorial on categorizing and tagging
- How can we best categorize each protocol?
Terminology
- How do we standardize terminology for easy understanding?
