OpenWetWare:Ideas: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Presentations/posters/papers ==
One thing that struck me as potentially useful would be a place to archive presentations and posters.  Might be useful to be able to look over others presentations to see how they presented things etc.  Similarly, it might be nice to also be able to post works in progress like papers or various writeups etc.  Of course, I can imagine several levels of release like private (probably wouldn't post), release to the Knight/Endy lab (wiki?) and release to the world (http://www.syntheticbiology.org?).<br>
*Does the wiki have a good mechanism for posting documents?  A quick look suggested to me that you could only upload pictures.<br>
*Or alternatively people can post documents in their own public directories.  Use MIT's certificate system to control who access the directories and then just put an external link on the wiki.  This gives maximum control over access to the author but does not centralize documents as much.  This also may be problematic as people graduate or leave the lab.
*Any better ideas?
== Collaborators ==
== Collaborators ==



Revision as of 11:21, 28 April 2005

Presentations/posters/papers

One thing that struck me as potentially useful would be a place to archive presentations and posters. Might be useful to be able to look over others presentations to see how they presented things etc. Similarly, it might be nice to also be able to post works in progress like papers or various writeups etc. Of course, I can imagine several levels of release like private (probably wouldn't post), release to the Knight/Endy lab (wiki?) and release to the world (http://www.syntheticbiology.org?).

  • Does the wiki have a good mechanism for posting documents? A quick look suggested to me that you could only upload pictures.
  • Or alternatively people can post documents in their own public directories. Use MIT's certificate system to control who access the directories and then just put an external link on the wiki. This gives maximum control over access to the author but does not centralize documents as much. This also may be problematic as people graduate or leave the lab.
  • Any better ideas?

Collaborators

Forgot to mention in lab meeting, but will be giving the Knight lab write access to the pages, talked with reshma and austin and they thought it made more sense to just have one wiki we could share rather than cross referencing seperate wikis. (might need a new name then).

Also, we could consider starting Collaborative Projects pages, for things such as the Standard BB strain, etc.

Ideas from Lab Meeting 4/27

Openness of the wiki

Options for public access:

  1. World-writable and readable
  2. World-readable only
  3. World-no access
  4. Hybrid
    • World can write to discussion but not to main articles.

We decided that we should go with option 2 for the time being at least until the wiki stabilizes and then consider making the wiki world-writable.