Lidstrom:GeneMorph II

Back to Protocols

These notes are assembled from Janet Matsen's 1st creation of an enzyme library, leveraging Yakov Kipnis' extensive experience.

Overview:

1. Mutazyme rxn (GeneMorph II kit)
2. PCR clean-up
3. Digest with NcoI/XhoI (+DpnI if desired)
4. Gel extraction
5. Insert self-ligation test
6. Ligation into backbone

Tips

Mutazyme II rxn

The enzyme in this kit is more sensitive to operating conditions than most polymerases. It can be sensitive to:

• template concentration (specifically inhibitors present)
• adding enzyme into the 10X buffer directly (best to add it at the end & not include it in a master mix).
• Yakov: "In my opinion Mutazyme is a little bit more finicky than other polymerases and requires more attention to make it work."

• First steps:
  • Make sure your amplification primers work using robust polymerase
    • Phusion works well because it has the same extension temperature. OneTaq Quick Load 2X also works at 72°C despite the suggested extension temperature of 68°C.
  • nester PCR?
    • You may consider nested PCR using gel purified product as template and standard robust polymerase (it is probably not even necessary to use high-fidelity polymerase)
• Optional controls:
  • omit template. This is useful when you are using a lot of template.
    • If you get a faint band that you think is your product, it may actually be some minor species in your template prep instead of what you think it is.
  • Include a well with OneTaq or Phusion as a + control.

• Once you have it working:
  • Run a range of template concentrations. Though the manual suggests correlations between template concentrations and mutation rates, it is best to use a range. Errors in NanoDrop DNA concentration calculations, pipetting, and PCR effects can effect the final mutation rate.
    • Yakov: "I always prepare several libraries (with different expected level of mutagenesis) and sequence 10-20 clones from each. This allows very reliable estimation of mutation load in each library and especially frequency of wild type sequences. For actual activity screening I obviously take the library/libraries that satisfy whatever criteria I had in mind."
    • Yakov: "I have been in the situations when GeneMorph kits simply didn't work (bad production batch probably). Mutagenic reactions with lowest possible concentration of template and largest number of cycles (conditions that according to instructions should flood the gene with 20 mutations/kb) barely produced 0.5 mutations/kb. Therefore I prefer scanning range of conditions (easiest being range of template concentrations) at least first time so not wasting time on sequential optimization of conditions. I do several reactions in parallel (taking advantage of using master mixes as much as possible) and preparing as many libraries as I feel necessary or can process. Characterizing the libraries with small scale sequencing. At the next step I pool together libraries I feel similar enough to each other, discarding bad libraries and end up with very few (even single) libraries I intend to screen."
• Re-amplify with Phusion or other high fidelity polymerase
  • This helps you have enough DNA to do the digests, gel purifications, and ligations. There is a small chance you will reduce the diversity of your transformants, but it is probably unlikey.

• Debugging
  • Consider using a minimal amount of template to see if something inhibitory is present. Or, desalt as you would a gibson with a millipore filter.
• Yakov: "I have seen that Mg2+ titrations may be very helpful (as in case of other polymerases) to get Mutazyme to work."

PCR cleanup

• Don't worry about yield loss here (Yakov advice)

Ligation into backbone

• re-ligate your digest to make sure the enzymes worked.

Transformation

• Yakov: "Transformation efficiency you want is limited by number of clones you can screen. There is no point of getting 10^9 transformants if you can test only 10^3. Any method reliably and reproducibly giving you 1000 colonies (if you can screen 96) should be OK. Electroporation is obviously a "gold standard", but considering hands-on time with cuvette, electroporator etc I would vote for something heat-shock based. Inoue's method is fine if you feel comfortable making your own cells. Advantage is you are not limited by bacterial strains available from companies. Buying cells is also fine. Since you don't need a lot of transformants you can easily split aliquot of commercial cells into several transformations which make it even more economically feasible. Keep in mind even commercial cells can be bad (I have encountered non-transformable cells from Invitrogen; I have obtained them via UW BioChem store therefore don't know whom to blame)."