Kevin Matthew McKay week 2: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(answered 1st part of assignment) |
(added links) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*When "r" was set at 10, the population of cells seemed to stabilize at around 11. The nutrient level decreased to around 0/ | *When "r" was set at 10, the population of cells seemed to stabilize at around 11. The nutrient level decreased to around 0/ | ||
*As "r" was increased, the quickness of the populations move to carrying capacity (all around 11 cells) increased. The line on the plot became steeper quicker, and then leveled out. | *As "r" was increased, the quickness of the populations move to carrying capacity (all around 11 cells) increased. The line on the plot became steeper quicker, and then leveled out. | ||
*[[Image:Test1.fig|r=10]] | |||
*[[Image:Test2.fig|r=50 ]] | |||
*[[Image:Test3.fig|r=100 ]] | |||
*[[Image:Test4.fig|r=1000 ]] | |||
*[[Image:Test5.fig|r=1]] | |||
Revision as of 12:43, 24 January 2013
- user:Kevin Matthew McKay
- week 2 assignment page
- I tested all of the parameters at different values, but was seemingly able to find a defined carrying capacity when isolating the variable parameter "r" or net growth rate for testing
- For a very small level or "r", (1) , there was a gradual increase in cell population as time went on. No carrying capacity was reached.
- When "r" was set at 10, the population of cells seemed to stabilize at around 11. The nutrient level decreased to around 0/
- As "r" was increased, the quickness of the populations move to carrying capacity (all around 11 cells) increased. The line on the plot became steeper quicker, and then leveled out.
- File:Test1.fig
- File:Test2.fig
- File:Test3.fig
- File:Test4.fig
- File:Test5.fig
