Kevin Matthew McKay week 2: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(added category) |
(answered 1st part of assignment) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*[[user:Kevin Matthew McKay]] | *[[user:Kevin Matthew McKay]] | ||
*[[BIOL398-03/S13:Week 2|week 2 assignment page]] | *[[BIOL398-03/S13:Week 2|week 2 assignment page]] | ||
*I tested all of the parameters at different values, but was seemingly able to find a defined carrying capacity when isolating the variable parameter "r" or net growth rate for testing | |||
*For a very small level or "r", (1) , there was a gradual increase in cell population as time went on. No carrying capacity was reached. | |||
*When "r" was set at 10, the population of cells seemed to stabilize at around 11. The nutrient level decreased to around 0/ | |||
*As "r" was increased, the quickness of the populations move to carrying capacity (all around 11 cells) increased. The line on the plot became steeper quicker, and then leveled out. | |||
Revision as of 12:36, 24 January 2013
- user:Kevin Matthew McKay
- week 2 assignment page
- I tested all of the parameters at different values, but was seemingly able to find a defined carrying capacity when isolating the variable parameter "r" or net growth rate for testing
- For a very small level or "r", (1) , there was a gradual increase in cell population as time went on. No carrying capacity was reached.
- When "r" was set at 10, the population of cells seemed to stabilize at around 11. The nutrient level decreased to around 0/
- As "r" was increased, the quickness of the populations move to carrying capacity (all around 11 cells) increased. The line on the plot became steeper quicker, and then leveled out.
