IGEM:University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich, UK/2009/Notebook/NRP-UEA-Norwich iGEM/2013/08/22

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Floor Two)
Line 6: Line 6:
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
==Floor Two==
==Floor Two==
-
We discovered after analysing the sequencing data from 18/07 that sample 3a had the correct sequence for biobrick BBa_K0141000 but sample 3b did not. This explained why sample 3b2, which was a miniprep from 3b, had extra NdeI sites. To confirm our theory, samples 3a, 3b, 3c and the orginal BBa_J04450 were cut with restriction enzyme and analysed by gel electrophoresis.  
+
We discovered after analysing the sequencing data from 18/07 that sample 3a had the correct sequence for biobrick BBa_K0141000 but sample 3b did not. This explained why sample 3b2, which was a miniprep from 3b, had extra NdeI sites. To confirm our theory, samples 3a, 3b, 3c and the orginal BBa_J04450 were cut with restriction enzyme pvuII and analysed by gel electrophoresis.  

Revision as of 08:42, 22 August 2013

Week Twelve Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Floor Two

We discovered after analysing the sequencing data from 18/07 that sample 3a had the correct sequence for biobrick BBa_K0141000 but sample 3b did not. This explained why sample 3b2, which was a miniprep from 3b, had extra NdeI sites. To confirm our theory, samples 3a, 3b, 3c and the orginal BBa_J04450 were cut with restriction enzyme pvuII and analysed by gel electrophoresis.



Personal tools