IGEM:University of East Anglia (UEA), Norwich, UK/2009/Notebook/NRP-UEA-Norwich iGEM/2013/08/22

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Autocreate 2013/08/22 Entry for IGEM:University_of_East_Anglia_(UEA),_Norwich,_UK/2009/Notebook/NRP-UEA-Norwich_iGEM)
Line 1: Line 1:
{|{{table}} width="800"
{|{{table}} width="800"
|-
|-
-
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> iGEM Project name 1</span>
+
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:igem-logo-150px.png|150px]]<span style="font-size:22px;"> Week Twelve</span>
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}}
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}}
|-
|-
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
-
==Entry title==
+
==Floor Two==
-
* Insert your content here.
+
We discovered after analysing the sequencing data from 18/07 that sample 3a had the correct sequence for biobrick BBa_K0141000 but sample 3b did not. This explained why sample 3b2, which was a miniprep from 3b, had extra NdeI sites. To confirm our theory, samples 3a, 3b, 3c and the orginal BBa_J04450 were cut with restriction enzyme and analysed by gel electrophoresis.  
-
 
+

Revision as of 08:41, 22 August 2013

Week Twelve Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Floor Two

We discovered after analysing the sequencing data from 18/07 that sample 3a had the correct sequence for biobrick BBa_K0141000 but sample 3b did not. This explained why sample 3b2, which was a miniprep from 3b, had extra NdeI sites. To confirm our theory, samples 3a, 3b, 3c and the orginal BBa_J04450 were cut with restriction enzyme and analysed by gel electrophoresis.



Personal tools