IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams

Return to Melbourne Homepage

FINAL

ETHZ 2007

• Good
  • ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
  • ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
  • Vistor count at the bottom of the page
  • Nice meet the team page

• Not so good
  • First page too dense

Harvard 2007

• Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)

UC Berkeley 2007

• Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).
  • Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?

Chiba 2006

• nice sort of layout on the front page

PRE

Brown 2007

• Border around front page?
• Public page - www.brownigem.com -
  • They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?

Harvard 2007

• Good layout
• Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
• Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good
  • should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
• Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
  • could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.

Imperial 2007

• breaking news section

Brown 2006

• concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)

GENERAL IDEAS

• team photo somewhere on both
• photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
• border design?
• presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
• calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)