IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
== '''FINAL'''==
== '''FINAL'''==
-
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/ETHZ|ETHZ 2007]''
+
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/ETHZ| ETHZ 2007]''
*Good
*Good
** ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
** ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
Line 15: Line 15:
-
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Harvard|Harvard 2007]''
+
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Harvard| Harvard 2007]''
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)
-
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Berkeley_UC|UC Berkeley 2007]''
+
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Berkeley_UC| UC Berkeley 2007]''
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).   
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).   
** Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?  
** Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?  
Line 28: Line 28:
-
''[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Chiba_University%2C_Japan_2006|Chiba 2006]''
+
''[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Chiba_University%2C_Japan_2006| Chiba 2006]''
* nice sort of layout on the front page  
* nice sort of layout on the front page  
''Cambridge 2006''
''Cambridge 2006''
-
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cambridge_University_2006|icon layout] ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
+
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cambridge_University_2006| icon layout] ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
''Imperial 2006''
''Imperial 2006''
-
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Imperial_College_2006|interesting process flow chart on front page ]
+
* [http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Imperial_College_2006| interesting process flow chart on front page ]
* very very good at colums  
* very very good at colums  
Line 48: Line 48:
-
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Ljubljana|Ljubljana]''
+
''[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Ljubljana| Ljubljana]''
* columned layout
* columned layout
* animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...  
* animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...  
Line 57: Line 57:
== '''PRE''' ==
== '''PRE''' ==
-
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Brown/2007|Brown 2007]''
+
''[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Brown/2007| Brown 2007]''
* Border around front page?  
* Border around front page?  
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
* Public page - www.brownigem.com -   
Line 75: Line 75:
''Imperial 2007''
''Imperial 2007''
-
*[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007|breaking news section] just make it red ;)
+
*[http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2007| breaking news section] just make it red ;)
''Brown 2006''
''Brown 2006''
-
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Brown:iGEM_portal_2006|concise front page] ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
+
*[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Brown:iGEM_portal_2006| concise front page] ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
Line 88: Line 88:
''Harvard 2006''
''Harvard 2006''
-
* [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2006|for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?]
+
* [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:Harvard/2006| for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?]

Revision as of 05:46, 6 April 2008

Return to Melbourne Homepage


FINAL

ETHZ 2007

  • Good
    • ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
    • ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
    • Vistor count at the bottom of the page
    • Nice meet the team page
  • Not so good
    • First page too dense


Harvard 2007

  • Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)


UC Berkeley 2007

  • Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).
    • Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?
    • icons again!!
    • colour scheme? - blueish maybe.. blood is red that is fair enough
    • i like the animated gif ... moving stuff is appealing to the eye... easy to do ...


Chiba 2006

  • nice sort of layout on the front page


Cambridge 2006

  • icon layout ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though


Imperial 2006

Imperial 2007 really good tabs on the top of the page


Glasgow


Ljubljana

  • columned layout
  • animation of the project ... grab these of the presentations...
  • visitor numbers and locations ... down the bottom
  • very simple banner ... they then put out flyers and stuff... i think it'd hilarious if we marketed this as a swiss clock/watch alternative and gave out a brochure ... :p


PRE

Brown 2007

  • Border around front page?
  • Public page - www.brownigem.com -
    • They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?


Harvard 2007

  • Good layout
  • Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
  • Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good
  • should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
  • Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
  • could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
  • a just for fun section ... we need to have more fun as a team... i say fridays at AO - (Animal Orchestra) or the pub


Imperial 2007


Brown 2006

  • concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)


Alberta 2007


Harvard 2006


GENERAL IDEAS

  • team photo somewhere on both
  • photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
  • border design?
  • presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
  • 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
  • indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles
  • poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
  • archive section
Personal tools