IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
* very very good at colums | * very very good at colums | ||
''Imperial 2007'' | |||
[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Imperial| really good tabs on the top of the page] | |||
| Line 68: | Line 70: | ||
''Brown 2006'' | ''Brown 2006'' | ||
*concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc) | *[http://parts2.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Brown:iGEM_portal_2006|concise front page] ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc) | ||
''Alberta 2007'' | ''Alberta 2007'' | ||
* | *[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/images/1/1a/Alberta_gantt.jpeg| wow they used a gantt chart ] | ||
== '''GENERAL IDEAS''' == | == '''GENERAL IDEAS''' == | ||
Revision as of 02:31, 6 April 2008
FINAL
ETHZ 2007
- Good
- ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
- ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
- Vistor count at the bottom of the page
- Nice meet the team page
- Not so good
- First page too dense
Harvard 2007
- Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)
UC Berkeley 2007
- Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).
- Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?
Chiba 2006
- nice sort of layout on the front page
Cambridge 2006
- icon layout ... easy information to grasp .. i like| needs better icons though
Harvard 2006
- for visitors section ... do we direct people to different section based on prior knowledge?
Imperial 2006
- interesting process flow chart on front page
- very very good at colums
Imperial 2007 really good tabs on the top of the page
PRE
Brown 2007
- Border around front page?
- Public page - www.brownigem.com -
- They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?
Harvard 2007
- Good layout
- Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
- Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good
- should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
- Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
- could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.
- a just for fun section ... we need to have more fun as a team... i say fridays at AO - (Animal Orchestra) or the pub
Imperial 2007
- breaking news section
Brown 2006
- front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)
Alberta 2007
GENERAL IDEAS
- team photo somewhere on both
- photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
- border design?
- presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
- calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
- indiviuals photos in the team profiles ... standardise the profiles
- poster design mini-team and section on the wiki...
- archive section
