IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
== '''FINAL''' ==
== '''FINAL''' ==


===ETHZ 2007===
ETHZ 2007
*Good
** ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
** ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
** Vistor count at the bottom of the page
** Nice meet the team page


'''Good'''
*Not so good
** First page too dense


* ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
* ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
* Vistor count at the bottom of the page
* Nice meet the team page


Harvard 2007
* Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)


'''Bad'''


* First page too dense
UC Berkeley 2007


* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results). 
** Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?


===Harvard 2007===


* Intro good
===Chiba 2006===
- What the project was


- What they had achieved
* nice sort of layout on the front page  
 
- What it could achieve in the future (applications)
 
 
===UC Berkeley 2007===
 
* Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results). 
** Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?




Line 58: Line 53:


*breaking news section
*breaking news section
===Brown 2006===
*concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)




Line 67: Line 72:
*team photo somewhere on both
*team photo somewhere on both
*photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
*photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
*border design?
*presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
*calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)

Revision as of 01:58, 6 April 2008

Return to Melbourne Homepage


FINAL

ETHZ 2007

  • Good
    • ETH Zurich drop down bar on each page
    • ETHZ banner on each page leads to homepage
    • Vistor count at the bottom of the page
    • Nice meet the team page
  • Not so good
    • First page too dense


Harvard 2007

  • Intro good - What the project was, What they had achieved, What it could achieve in the future (applications)


UC Berkeley 2007

  • Nice brief description of the different components (with links to pages with details including results).
    • Do we want to introduce the components on the front page?


Chiba 2006

  • nice sort of layout on the front page


PRE

Brown 2007

  • Border around front page?
  • Public page - www.brownigem.com -
    • They had a video that got onto the OWW and synbio front page last year - do we want to do this ?


Harvard 2007

  • Good layout
  • Links to tools (plasmid mappers, blast2seq etc...) frequently used stuff
  • Detailed protocols of experiments to date--good
    • should we include protocols when reporting what was done each day or would we prefer to link it to a separate page of protocols like Peking’s?
  • Repeat of details of the same experiment done on a different day not required.
    • could just list changes (if any) made to protocol.


Imperial 2007

  • breaking news section



Brown 2006

  • concise front page ... emphasises the right things ... (big font = important links - todo list, meetings, biobricks, overview etc)




GENERAL IDEAS

  • team photo somewhere on both
  • photo(s) of Bio21 ... taken by us not generic
  • border design?
  • presentation section ... devoted purely to stuff to do with the presentation (berkeley 06)
  • calagary 06 nicely design banners/logo? (ie. not done in paint) - we all have friends that could whip something together thats fairly spiffy ;)
Retrieved from "https://openwetware.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=IGEM:Melbourne/2008/WikiManagement/OtherTeams&oldid=194606"