IGEM:Imperial/2010/Parts

From OpenWetWare

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(ComCDE amino acid and nucleotide sequences)
(LytC)
Line 27: Line 27:
|[[Image:Biobricks.jpg|700px|thumb|center|alt=A|BBs]]
|[[Image:Biobricks.jpg|700px|thumb|center|alt=A|BBs]]
 +
 +
===AIP fusion protein===
 +
LytC is a candidate cell wall protein that we could attach the CSP to. The LytC sequence can be found in this [[LytC_sequences.docx | document]].
===ComCDE signaling===
===ComCDE signaling===

Revision as of 09:43, 28 July 2010

Contents

Registry use workshop videos

The following website contains really good videos that teach how to efficiently use registry. It could be useful to explore these videos before starting the extensive search for coding sequences. It provides answers to:

  • 4 searches to choos from - which one should I use?
  • how to add parts to registry?
  • what are the requirements of judging parts?
  • what are the safety concerns?

Chassis Options

Ideally, we would use B. subtilis because it is a well characterised gram positive bacterium that does quorum sensing using small peptides as autoinducers. These small peptides could be produced as a result of cleavage of a membrane-anchored protein by a protease from the parasite which we want to detect.

However, there are issues regarding the extracellular proteases produced by gram positive bacteria. These could interfere with the system and could result in false positives or degrade the protease detection peptide. There are protease deficient strains available that may bypass some of these problems.

Protease detector peptides (small linear quourum sensing peptide attached to protease recognition sequence) may also get trapped between the cell wall and cell membraine. To avoid this we looked into mechanisms of transport and attachment of these peptides to the ouside of cell wall. An alternative is to secrete detector peptides into the medium as B.subtilis is very good at secreting proteins.

Another option is to attach the small protease detector peptides on to pili (fimbriae) that are normally presented on the bacterial cell. This has been done routinely on E.coli fimbriae at non-conserved regions and outer membrane proteins to present various antigens [[1]]. There is also a good review of a variety of export patways that have been used [[2]] in gram negative bacteria. There is a lot work done on gram positive bacteria, although there is a detailed and very accessible review [[3]] of current understanding of G+ve cell surface.

Surpulus information on B. Subtilis chassis Subti-Wiki

E.coli was also considered as a possible option. Despite the G-ve outer membraine, there are strains that have been made more permeable through knockout of Lipid A biosynthesis in lipolysaccharides (lpxA,lpxD [[4]]). There are also proteins that can disrupt membraraines when they are inserted in them, thus making them more permeable. These chages in permeability are likely due to transient ruptures of outer membraine and so unlikely to make a very responsive or robust detecton organism [[5]].

Biobricks

|
BBs
BBs


AIP fusion protein

LytC is a candidate cell wall protein that we could attach the CSP to. The LytC sequence can be found in this document.

ComCDE signaling

ComC accession no AAC44895.1, ComD accession no AAC44896.1, ComE accession no AAC44897

The Com operon sequence can be found in this word document. The individual ComC, ComD and ComE genes, including their flanking sequences can be found in this word document. More information about the amino acid sequences, including the protein sizes can be found in this document.

ComE binding site

ComE binding sites in the promoters of the comCDE and comAB operons:

Image:Come_binding.bmp

This was the consensus sequence from the paper which talks about how BlpR and ComE upregulate transcription of an ABC transporter.

Personal tools