IGEM:Imperial/2010/Modelling

From OpenWetWare
Revision as of 06:41, 30 July 2010 by Piotr D. Faba (talk | contribs) (→‎Kinetic constants: constantd table)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Have a look at this link: Synthetic Biology (Spring2008): Computer Modelling Practicals

Example on how Valencia 2006 team used SimulLink to simulate their project: Valencia 2006 PowerPoint presentation

Output amplification

Is it better to use TEV all the way or HIV1? Modelling should allows us to take decision which design is more efficient. If taken further, it will allow us to determine number of amplification steps that are most favourable.

A
TEV is used at both stages of amplification
A
At each stage of amplification a distinct protease is being used
A
TEV is used at both stages of amplification
A
At each stage of amplification a distinct protease is being used
A
Model improved to account for the enzymes (protease action)

Kinetic constants

Quality GFP TEV
Km and Kcat Doesn't apply TEV constants (Km and kcat)
half-life or degradation rate Half-life of GFP in Bacillus = 1.5 hours - ref. Chris ?
production rate in B.sub ? ?