IGEM:Cambridge/2008/Turing Pattern Formation/Experiments: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 88: Line 88:


[[Image:1uM AHL plus.jpg | thumb | right | AHL with Bacillus]]
[[Image:1uM AHL plus.jpg | thumb | right | AHL with Bacillus]]
[[Plot_-_1uM_AHL_bac.jpg | thumb | center | Plot profile of AHL with Bacillus]]

Revision as of 10:49, 17 August 2008



Finding and Biobricking proper Ribosomal Binding Sites

Testing Sender and Reciever

  • We can test one, then use to test the other, or we can test them in parallel

Testing AgrC Reciever

  • Use purified AIP
    • Synthesized
    • Sourced
      • Possibly from Tom Muir at Rochester
    • S. aureus purified supernatant (requires Pathology department personnel)
      • Guangyong Ji at Catholic University has a protocol for purification

Testing AgrA Transcription Factor and P2 promoter

  • Can we get an 'always on' mutant my modifying some residues? (Jim's Idea)

Testing AgrB Exporter

  • Membrane Localization Test
    • Can use membrane fractionation
    • Can use antibody tags with EM and gold

Testing AgrD Prepeptide/AIP

  • Mass Spec Assay
    • Daniel Goodman 11:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC):Speaking to Kathryn Lilley in Proteomics
  • S. aureus Reporter Strain
    • Daniel Goodman 11:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC):We cannot use staph ourselves, checking to see if we can get someone in Pathology department to test for us

Testing AHL sender and receiver

Testing AHL receiver (T9002)

  • Spot 10 μl 10μM AHL on receiver-soft agar overlay and test for fluorescece. Result: postive response.
  • Spot a range of AHL concentrations (10μM, 1μM, 10nM, 1nM)for a qualitative dose-response test. Result: can detect down to 1μM AHL using UV lamp, but response is poor.
  • The above test is re-run this time using fresh, log-phase receiver cells (2 hours incubation after inoculation) and a different set of AHL concentrations (10μM, 1μM, 100nM, 10nM). Detection much higher for 10μM and 1μM. Observable response to 10nM although signal-to-noise ratio is poor.

Testing AHL sender (I13202)

  • Sender grown overnight from plate in 2*10 ml LB. Receiver grown overnight from plate in 10 ml LB.
  • 3 Amp plates made with receiver-SA overlay (see above). In addition, the SA overlay of the 4th plate contains 1mM IPTG.
  • 10 ml of sender culture used for plates 1,2 and 4.
    • Plate 1: spot 10μL sender on the center of the plate.
    • Plate 2: Spot 10μL sender premixed with IPTG (final concentration of 1mM). Spot immediately after mixing.
    • Plate 4: Spot 10μL sender (plate contains IPTG)
  • 10 ml of sender culture pelleted and resuspended in LB containing 1mM IPTG. Grow for 2 hours.
    • Plate 3: Culture pelleted again and 10μL supernatant, which contains AHL, spotted onto plate.
  • Result
    • All plates, including plate 1, had high levels of fluorescence, detectable by a UV lamp. This confirms that the lacI+pL hybrid promoter (R0011) is constitutively on at a high level (http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_R0011). However, there is no evidence for higher fluorescence in the presence of IPTG despite claims that a 600 fold increase in expression should occur. This may be because the concentration of sender is too high.
    • The properties of lacI+pL, though interesting, is not of concern for our project, as we intend to use another Bacillus compatible promoter anyways.
    • This experiment has confirmed that the sender is definitely capable of secreting AHL, which is sufficient for this stage.
  • Future work:
    • A lower concentration of sender could be used either by dilution or lower growth times.
    • for better quantification, we could try a protocol similar to the one used by the NCBS 2007 team.

Testing degradation of AHL by bacillus aiiA

  • 5 plates without selection with E.coli receiver overlay in soft agar. Center of plate spotted with:
    • B subtilis in LB and AHL in EA medium without incubation
    • B subtilis in EA medium only (control for competition between B.subtilis and E.coli)
    • AHL only
    • B.subtilis and AHL incubated for 90 minutes at room temperature
    • B.subtilis in overnight growth medium (test for effect of acidity on AHL) and AHL in EA.
  • Plates grown overnight
  • Result: inconclusive. All plates except plate 2 (no AHL) had similar levels of fluorescence. No fluorescence in plate 2. This may because our Bacillus strain (168) is a aiiA knockout, as no aiiA gene was found in the genome. However, at 5 hours after incubation, only plate 3 (no Bacillus) had detectable levels of fluoresence.

Testing different volumes

Our previous experiments were inconclusive because we believed that we possibly swamped our Bacillus with excess amounts of AHL so that no appreciable degradation was seen. In this experiment we tested and compared different concentrations of AHL.

Fluorescence with 1 uM AHL

Without Bacillus: 2457 With Bacillus: 2497

Fluorescence with 10nM AHL

Without Bacillus: 1424 With Bacillus: 1318

Fluorescence with 1nM AHL

not enough for good readings

AHL without Bacillus
Plot profile of AHL without Bacillus
AHL with Bacillus

thumb | center | Plot profile of AHL with Bacillus