IGEM:Caltech/2007/Project/Cro: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


===Potential Binding Combinations===
===Potential Binding Combinations===
When repressor binds to OR2 [only], RNA polymerase bind to PRM and prevents its binding to the PR region.  leading to transcription of cI tenfold (Positive Control) and turning off the ''cro'' gene (Negative Control).
When cI repressor binds to OR2 [only], RNA polymerase bind to PRM and prevents its binding to the PR region.  leading to transcription of cI tenfold (Positive Control) and turning off the ''cro'' gene (Negative Control).


When repressor binds to OR1, RNA polymerase favors neither PRM nor PR. Polymerase access to PR is blocked, but the absence of repressor fails to attract polymerase to the PRM region, leading to a very low level of PRM.
When cI repressor binds to OR1, RNA polymerase favors neither PRM nor PR. Polymerase access to PR is blocked, but the absence of repressor fails to attract polymerase to the PRM region, leading to a very low level of PRM.


A repressor bound to OR3 blocks PRM transcription, but polymerase can still easily reach PR.
A cI repressor bound to OR3 blocks PRM transcription, but polymerase can still easily reach PR.
 
'''Deborah - need to be more clear here. Distinguish between cI and cro'''


==Role in Lambda Lifecycle==
==Role in Lambda Lifecycle==
Line 28: Line 26:




The switch to lysis is brought on by stimuli [such as ultraviolet light] that damages the bacteria’s DNA. This activates a bacterial protein (RecA) which cleaves repressor molecules. As the concentration of cI drops, OR1 and OR2 become unoccupied. cI transcription ceases, and the RNA polymerase binds to PR to transcribe ''cro''. Cro binds independently to OR1, OR2, and OR3, preventing PRM transcription. The genes to the right of ''cro'' are also transcribed, which leads to the lytic phase.
The switch to lysis is brought on by stimuli [such as ultraviolet light] that damages the bacteria’s DNA. This activates a bacterial protein (RecA) which cleaves the cI repressor molecules. As the concentration of cI drops, OR1 and OR2 become unoccupied. cI transcription ceases, and the RNA polymerase binds to PR to transcribe ''cro''. Cro binds independently to OR1, OR2, and OR3, preventing PRM transcription. The genes to the right of ''cro'' are also transcribed, which leads to the lytic phase.
 
As parts of a bistable switch, Cro and cI repressor protein levels in the cell directs the choice between lysis and lysogeny :
 
- When no cI is present, the ""cro"" gene produces Cro (leading to lysis).
- With higher cI repressor levels in the cell, only the cI gene is active, resulting in lysogeny.
- At very high cI concentrations, both cI and cro transcription is repressed.


==Original Goal==
==Original Goal==

Revision as of 08:28, 26 October 2007


iGEM 2007

Home        People        Project        Protocols        Notes        Changes       


Cro

Background

The lambda phage’s Cro is a 66 amino acid long protein that exists primarily as dimmers in the cell. Cro and lambda repressor cI can both potentially bind to three operator sites, OR1, OR2, and OR3.

Potential Binding Combinations

When cI repressor binds to OR2 [only], RNA polymerase bind to PRM and prevents its binding to the PR region. leading to transcription of cI tenfold (Positive Control) and turning off the cro gene (Negative Control).

When cI repressor binds to OR1, RNA polymerase favors neither PRM nor PR. Polymerase access to PR is blocked, but the absence of repressor fails to attract polymerase to the PRM region, leading to a very low level of PRM.

A cI repressor bound to OR3 blocks PRM transcription, but polymerase can still easily reach PR.

Role in Lambda Lifecycle

In a lysogenic cell, the repressor is usually bound to OR1 and OR2. Cooperativity between adjacent repressor molecules raises the operators’ affinities for repressor. A normal [lysogenic] repressor concentration causes transcription of cI and prevents cro synthesis. As repressor concentration increases further, repressor binds to OR3 and turns off the cl gene, allowing a constant level of repressor despite changes in growth rate.


The switch to lysis is brought on by stimuli [such as ultraviolet light] that damages the bacteria’s DNA. This activates a bacterial protein (RecA) which cleaves the cI repressor molecules. As the concentration of cI drops, OR1 and OR2 become unoccupied. cI transcription ceases, and the RNA polymerase binds to PR to transcribe cro. Cro binds independently to OR1, OR2, and OR3, preventing PRM transcription. The genes to the right of cro are also transcribed, which leads to the lytic phase.

As parts of a bistable switch, Cro and cI repressor protein levels in the cell directs the choice between lysis and lysogeny :

- When no cI is present, the ""cro"" gene produces Cro (leading to lysis). - With higher cI repressor levels in the cell, only the cI gene is active, resulting in lysogeny. - At very high cI concentrations, both cI and cro transcription is repressed.

Original Goal

First, we tried to find a titration curve of the Cro protein. The cro gene was placed behind a tetracycline-inducible promoter. By varying the amounts of anhydrotetracycline (aTc) in the media, we produced a range of Cro concentrations in the bacteria. These bacteria were infected with phage carrying a mutation in cro, so the phage would only be lytic if sufficient cro were present in the host. By measuring percent lysis at each concentration, we could determine how much aTc was required to complement the mutant phage. Comparing these values to a similar tet-inducible YFP, we could choose an appropriate riboregulator to control Cro production in the final engineered phage.

Status and Future Plans

Deborah, fill in here