Haynes Lab:Notebook/Jan/2013/10/18: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Jan Simper (talk | contribs) |
Jan Simper (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| || 15 μL --> 37°C/ 15 min. | | || 15 μL --> 37°C/ 15 min. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Both samples 1 and 3 had a band slightly above the 3000 bp band, which was probably the 3200 bp vector. In addition, both samples 1 and 3 had a band slightly above the 700 bp band, which was likely the 705 bp plasmid. Overall, there is evidence to conclude that Sample 1 is the cloned plasmid DNA because of its similarities to the control DNA. Sample 2 had no bands of any sort and there was likely no DNA there in the first place due to a bad miniprep. Sample 1 was submitted for DNA sequencing to confirm that it is in fact the cloned plasmid DNA. | |||
Revision as of 12:21, 9 November 2013
Project name | <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page <html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html> </html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraction and Verification of mCh
Both samples 1 and 3 had a band slightly above the 3000 bp band, which was probably the 3200 bp vector. In addition, both samples 1 and 3 had a band slightly above the 700 bp band, which was likely the 705 bp plasmid. Overall, there is evidence to conclude that Sample 1 is the cloned plasmid DNA because of its similarities to the control DNA. Sample 2 had no bands of any sort and there was likely no DNA there in the first place due to a bad miniprep. Sample 1 was submitted for DNA sequencing to confirm that it is in fact the cloned plasmid DNA.
|