Haynes Lab:Notebook/HPK-CFP insertion into Gal4EED/Luc using CRISPR/2015/04/29: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
(fix raw html notebook nav)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
|-
|-
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:owwnotebook_icon.png|128px]]<span style="font-size:22px;">Plasmid Prep & Validation of DBN004_pSB1A3</span>
|style="background-color: #EEE"|[[Image:owwnotebook_icon.png|128px]]<span style="font-size:22px;">Plasmid Prep & Validation of DBN004_pSB1A3</span>
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|<html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> [[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>[[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]]<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>}}
|style="background-color: #F2F2F2" align="center"|[[File:Report.png|frameless|link={{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}]][[{{#sub:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|0|-11}}|Main project page]]<br />{{#if:{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[File:Resultset_previous.png|frameless|link={{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}]][[{{#lnpreventry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Previous entry]]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;}}{{#if:{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}|[[{{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}{{!}}Next entry]][[File:Resultset_next.png|frameless|link={{#lnnextentry:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}]]}}
|-
|-
| colspan="2"|
| colspan="2"|
Line 68: Line 68:


Digest for 10 minutes at 37°C.
Digest for 10 minutes at 37°C.
==Gel Electrophoresis==
Load 15 µL of digest on the gel. Expected size fragments are 525, 1246, and 2536bp.
[[Image:2015-04-29_DBN004_pSB1A3_SpeI_ApaLI_digest_annotated.png]]
All twelve colonies are have size fragments at ~1200, ~500 and ~400bp. This doesn't match with an SpeI/ApaLI digestion of DBN004_pSB1A3, but it does match with plain pSB1A3 when digested with the same enzymes. My guess is the few colonies that survived Type IIS digestion/ligation were the ones that could excise the insert and retain the ampR gene in the plasmid.
I also didn't realize this until just now, but there's a BsaI cut site inside the AmpR gene. Should have checked that before ordering the DBN001 fragment and before amplifying the DBN002 & DBN003 fragments. Not sure how to proceed from here.
-----
Spoke with Dr. Haynes, here are the main options for improving efficiency of the Type IIS restriction/ligation:
# Increase ratio of insert to vector
# Use NEB ligase buffer instead of T4 ligase buffer
In order to reduce the possible number of recombination events, I'm going to try ligating the DBN002 & DBN003 fragments together. There are a couple ways to do this, as well:
# Type IIS ligation using the existing fragments
# Traditional BioBrick cloning with conventional restriction enzymes
## One difficulty there: don't have primers/template for BioBrick cloning. Looking through the library doesn't show any good templates. Will have to do more searching.


<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->
<!-- ##### DO NOT edit below this line unless you know what you are doing. ##### -->

Latest revision as of 00:56, 27 September 2017

Plasmid Prep & Validation of DBN004_pSB1A3 Main project page
Previous entry      Next entry

Overview

After picking 12 colonies to streak and grow liquid cultures, I'm going to harvest them, perform plasmid minipreps, quantify DNA, and do a basic verification using restriction digest and gel electrophoresis.

Plasmid Miniprep

All twelve colonies grew in liquid culture. Samples were prepared using the Sigma GenElute Plasmid Miniprep kit.

DNA Concentration

Sample ID Conc. (ng/µL) St Dev (ng/µL) 260/280
1.1 108.1 2.76 1.95
1.2 140.5 11.25 1.95
1.3 161.1 1.54 1.92
1.4 146.0 2.89 1.94
2.1 149.9 0.79 1.93
2.2 185.7 24.56 1.88
2.3 193.9 21.42 1.90
2.4 110.9 1.89 1.89
5.1 149.3 8.35 1.91
5.2 148.3 0.37 1.88
5.3 142.3 17.26 1.88
5.4 123.6 1.00 1.91

Restriction Digest

Reagent Volume
DNA 600ng (5 µL)
10x FastDigest Buffer 3
ApaLI 1
SpeI 1
Water 20
Total 30

Digest for 10 minutes at 37°C.

Gel Electrophoresis

Load 15 µL of digest on the gel. Expected size fragments are 525, 1246, and 2536bp.

All twelve colonies are have size fragments at ~1200, ~500 and ~400bp. This doesn't match with an SpeI/ApaLI digestion of DBN004_pSB1A3, but it does match with plain pSB1A3 when digested with the same enzymes. My guess is the few colonies that survived Type IIS digestion/ligation were the ones that could excise the insert and retain the ampR gene in the plasmid.

I also didn't realize this until just now, but there's a BsaI cut site inside the AmpR gene. Should have checked that before ordering the DBN001 fragment and before amplifying the DBN002 & DBN003 fragments. Not sure how to proceed from here.


Spoke with Dr. Haynes, here are the main options for improving efficiency of the Type IIS restriction/ligation:

  1. Increase ratio of insert to vector
  2. Use NEB ligase buffer instead of T4 ligase buffer

In order to reduce the possible number of recombination events, I'm going to try ligating the DBN002 & DBN003 fragments together. There are a couple ways to do this, as well:

  1. Type IIS ligation using the existing fragments
  2. Traditional BioBrick cloning with conventional restriction enzymes
    1. One difficulty there: don't have primers/template for BioBrick cloning. Looking through the library doesn't show any good templates. Will have to do more searching.