Haynes Lab:Notebook/CRISPR Editing/2014/08/04: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
==08/04/14==
==08/04/14==
* mCherry CRISPR qPCR
* mCherry CRISPR qPCR
*  
* Gal4EED/luc CRISPR - change growth medium to pen-strep-free, with 1 μg/mL dox for dox+ cells




Line 85: Line 85:


'''Results'''
'''Results'''
* Hypothesis 1 - CNV melt: CRISPR editing will result in a lower loading-normalized peak height value, compared to untreated cells
* Hypothesis 2 - US-specific amplification: CRISPR editing will result in a lower loading-normalized Cq value, compared to untreated cells


CRISPR 1 - CNV melt
CRISPR 1 - CNV melt
* Primer pair 1 (q2F_q3R)
* Primer pair 1 (q2F_q3R)
** Untreated control Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =  
** Untreated control Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =  
** Untreated control Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =  
** CRISPR treated Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =  
** Conclusion:
** Conclusion:
** Notes: no signal from nTc, so good primer pair with nor primer dimer signal
** Notes: no signal from nTc, so good primer pair with nor primer dimer signal


Experiment 1 - CNV melt
CRISPR 2 - CNV melt
* Primer pair 1 (q2F_q3R)
* Primer pair 1 (q2F_q3R)
** Untreated control Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =  
** Untreated control Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =  

Revision as of 06:21, 5 August 2014

Project name <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

08/04/14

  • mCherry CRISPR qPCR
  • Gal4EED/luc CRISPR - change growth medium to pen-strep-free, with 1 μg/mL dox for dox+ cells



mCherry CRISPR qPCR
Experimental samples:

  1. "1" - gRNA1/Cas9
  2. "2" - gRNA2/Cas9
  3. "4" - gRNA4T/Cas9n, gRNA4B/Cas9n
  • Extracted genomic DNA from these using the QIAmp genomic DNA mini kit (8/03/14)

Master reaction list

Rxn # Template Target (primers) Method
1 1 q2F_q3R CNV melt
2 1 P3F_q3R CNV melt
3 1 GAPDH B2 CNV melt
4 Blank q2F_q3R CNV melt
5 Blank P3F_q3R CNV melt
6 Blank GAPDH B2 CNV melt
7 nTc q2F_q3R CNV melt
8 nTc P3F_q3R CNV melt
9 nTc GAPDH B2 CNV melt
10 4 q2R_q2F US specific
11 4 P3F_q3R US specific
12 4 GAPDH B2 US specific
13 Blank q2R_q2F US specific
14 Blank P3F_q3R US specific
15 Blank GAPDH B2 US specific
16 nTc q2R_q2F US specific
17 nTc P3F_q3R US specific
18 nTc GAPDH B2 US specific
19 2 q1F_q1R CNV melt
20 2 GAPDH B2 CNV melt
21 4 q2F_P2R CNV melt
22 4 GAPDH B2 CNV melt
23 Blank q1F_q1R CNV melt
24 Blank q2F_P2R CNV melt
25 Blank GAPDH B2 CNV melt
26 nTc q1F_q1R CNV melt
27 nTc q2F_P2R CNV melt
28 nTc GAPDH B2 CNV melt


Results

  • Hypothesis 1 - CNV melt: CRISPR editing will result in a lower loading-normalized peak height value, compared to untreated cells
  • Hypothesis 2 - US-specific amplification: CRISPR editing will result in a lower loading-normalized Cq value, compared to untreated cells

CRISPR 1 - CNV melt

  • Primer pair 1 (q2F_q3R)
    • Untreated control Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =
    • CRISPR treated Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =
    • Conclusion:
    • Notes: no signal from nTc, so good primer pair with nor primer dimer signal

CRISPR 2 - CNV melt

  • Primer pair 1 (q2F_q3R)
    • Untreated control Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =
    • Untreated control Peak_q2F_q3R / Peak_GAPDH =
    • Conclusion: