Endy:Chassis engineering/VM2.0: Difference between revisions
From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Barry Canton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Barry Canton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
#**parameter sensitivity analysis | #**parameter sensitivity analysis | ||
#*Response time | #*Response time | ||
#**Better to have this fast or slow (slow response time averages out short time scale fluctuations) | |||
#Self-booting/controlled | #Self-booting/controlled | ||
#*Ability to turn on or off | #*Ability to turn on or off |
Revision as of 13:54, 8 March 2007
VM2.0 regulation design considerations
- Stability
- Noise
- analytical stability analysis on very simple model or Routh-Hurwitz analysis for full model
- parameter sensitivity analysis
- Response time
- Better to have this fast or slow (slow response time averages out short time scale fluctuations)
- Noise
- Self-booting/controlled
- Ability to turn on or off
- Portability
- Tunable
- Pros and cons of DNA copy number, promoter strength, repressor affinities etc.
- Efficient
- Minimizing levels of repressor needed
- Minimizing consumption of small molecules
What are the metrics for each of the design considerations?
Model
Continuous differential equation model in MATLAB
Species
- T7 RNAP
- Repressor
- Ribosomes
- Repressible T7 promoter
- T7RNAP-promoter complex
- Repressor-promoter complex
- T7 RNAP mRNA
- Repressor mRNA
- Elongating T7 RNAP
- Elongating Ribosomes
- etc.
Model analysis notes
- A cooperative autogene network can exhibit bistability or monostability depending on parameter values (7.81). Does this apply if there is no cooperativity?