CTR:Notebook/PIRE/2014/11/17: Difference between revisions

From OpenWetWare
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 15: Line 15:


[http://openwetware.org/images/7/7d/Mice-gDNA_SL.xlsx Mice Quant Results]<br>
[http://openwetware.org/images/7/7d/Mice-gDNA_SL.xlsx Mice Quant Results]<br>
Mice extracts from 2013. PicoGreen showed higher concentrations than the frog extracts. 2μL of each extract run on gel to check for quality.<br>
Mouse extracts from 2013. PicoGreen showed higher concentrations than the frog extracts. 2μL of each extract run on gel to check for quality.<br>
[[Image:Mice1.JPG | 400px]]<br>
[[Image:Mice1.JPG | 400px]]<br>
[[Image:Mice2.JPG | 400px]]<br>
[[Image:Mice2.JPG | 400px]]<br>

Revision as of 16:01, 2 December 2014

PIRE RAD Library Preps <html><img src="/images/9/94/Report.png" border="0" /></html> Main project page
<html><img src="/images/c/c3/Resultset_previous.png" border="0" /></html>Previous entry<html>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</html>Next entry<html><img src="/images/5/5c/Resultset_next.png" border="0" /></html>

Frog and Mouse DNA QC

Nov. 2014

Frog Quant Results
Frog extracts from 2013. When run on PicoGreen/Qubit, concentrations were far lower than reported Nanodrop scores. Re-running Nanodrop at UCLA yielded similar numbers to reported concentrations. 1μL from 4 samples run on gel showed no bands.

Mice Quant Results
Mouse extracts from 2013. PicoGreen showed higher concentrations than the frog extracts. 2μL of each extract run on gel to check for quality.


Band at ~550bp is RNA.



Retrieved from "https://openwetware.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=CTR:Notebook/PIRE/2014/11/17&oldid=846706"